Destructive Repairs

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting January 25 to study Judges 21.  This chapter wraps up the book of Judges, and it's a real nutter.

This chapter also wraps up the final story of Judges, where the tribe of Benjamin is wiped out and then restored.  This is where it's restored, and how.  Read through this chapter along with the previous two again. Look closely at the perception of the problem and the solution.

Go back through the chapter with the questions below:

• Verse 1 happens before the battles wiping out Benjamin.  There's no overt explicit criticism of this vow, but what do you think the author thinks of the vow?  Consider how many times he refers to it in the chapter.
• The people worship before Yahweh, lamenting the loss of Benjamin.  The question, why, is probably rhetorical.  If they were asked why, what do you think they would have answered? Do you think they thought it was their fault, the will of Yahweh, or something else?
• Verse 5 doesn't seem to fit right there.  It fits as an explanation about what follows, but would flow better after verse 7, and verse 8 basically repeats it.  Why do you think the author left it where it is?
• From verses 1, 6, and 7, what do you think about the problem the people of Israel are trying to fix?
• Jabesh-Gilead was missing from the muster in Beth-El.  People from Gilead, the region, showed (20:1), but not from that town. Why do you think the people of Israel were so severe with the town? It's not like they had done anything like Gibeah, so what do you think is the problem they're "fixing" by wiping it out?
• The process of destroying Jabesh-Gilead nets 400 wives for the 600 at the Rock of Rimmon. But where did they bring them? Weren't they at Bethel?  Why do you think the text has Shiloh here instead of Bethel?
• The 400 wives for the 600 men is at least a begining, so they start the peace process with the remnant of Benjamin.  They're still short 200 wives, and the people are still sorry, but for what Yahweh has done (v.15).  Why do you think the people are fixing a problem caused by Yahweh? Is what He causes a problem to be fixed?
• Again, Shiloh becomes part of the solution, only this time, unwillingly.  What do you think of the solution the elders have for the remaining 200 wives?
• The prepared explanation to Shiloh when they complain seems odd.  Weren't the elders from Shiloh part of the elders having this discussion and coming up with the plan?  If not, why not? What do you think is going on here?
• Once the remaining 200 wives are "captured" from Shiloh, all the people depart to their homes. How long do you think this all took?
• The final verse to this chapter and the book is about there being no king in Israel and that each man did what they thought was right.  This phrase repeats Judges 17:6, and the part about there being no king is repeated in 18:1 and 19:1.  Out of four occurrences, half have both the missing king and the doing right in their own eyes, and half have just the part about the missing king.  What do you think is the reason for the missing phrase about doing right in their own eyes?
• How do you think this final statement summarizes these two stories, and the book of Judges?

That wraps up the chapter and the book of Judges.  Think through what you would say you've learned about God from this book?  See y'all Thursday!

A Collection of Travesties

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting January 18 to study Judges 19, and, hopefully, Judges 20.  These chapters wrap up the book of Judges, and form a "conclusion" for the writer.  Much of his point for the whole book is contained in these final three chapters.

Read through the remaining 3 chapters (which is a lot) because all three make up the whole of the story.  You want a context as we dig into each piece.  Look for themes as you read.  Don't rely solely on the repeated statement about there being no king in Israel, look beyond that to why that's important.

As you read, ask questions about the account.  What is the author's point? Why does he write the way he does?  What does he want his audience to learn from this?  Remember the three different time periods to keep in mind, the time of the events, the time of the author, and our time.  There's a connection between those periods that God has preserved, and that connection carries our lesson about God Himself.

 After you have your own notes and questions, go back through these chapters with a commentary, or study Bible notes.The more options you use, the better sense you'll get of just how confusing these chapters really are.  It's not you, these chapters are confusing for everyone.  But God has a message and a lesson about himself in them.  Revise your notes and questions as you look through the commentaries.

After you had all that fun becoming confused and getting lost in the details, go back through with the questions below:


Judges 19

• We, again, start with the refrain about there being no king in Israel.  The writer writes this during the time of the kings, probably from Judah, so why do you think this is so important to him?
• Again, we have a Levite as a character.  Once again, Ephraim and Bethlehem are locations for the setting of the story.  These elements probably tied these accounts together in the minds of the author and his audience.  What do you think is the likelihood that both Levites are the same person?  What would that mean for the timing of this account?
• The Levite's concubine is unfaithful to him and goes back home to Bethlehem.  Yet the Levite goes after her.  What does this tell you about how the Levite views this woman?  She's not his wife, but under a different legal status as a concubine.  Why do you think he's so invested in recovering her when she's been unfaithful?
• The woman's father welcomes the Levite gladly, but then delays him several days.  What do you think is going on there, why do you think the girl's father is so determined to delay them?
• The Levite, his servant, and the girl leave late, and can't make it far.  Read verse 10, then skip to verse 13, and continue to verse 14.  Now go back and start at verse 11, read 12, then skip to 15.  You may need to read it aloud to get a sense of what's happening.  What do you hear as you read it this way?
• Can you sense the scene setup like a horror movie as you read verse 15? No one will open their home to him, which is very strange for that culture.  Everyone seems to know something bad is coming.  What do you think about the author using such a literary device?  What do you think his audience thought?
• If you read the NASB or ESV, you'll see the word, "behold", which is a Hebrew literary idiom marking something important for the reader, sort like, "Check it out!" said while pointing where to look.  This draws attention to the old man. He isn't a local either.  Why do you think that detail is important to the author?
• The old man won't let the man remain in the square, but he doesn't say why.  The Levite seems content, but the old man is insistent.  Combined with the shut doors of everyone else in the town, this heightens the tension.  Something evil this way comes.  What does this sort of literary sophistication tell you about this author?  What do you think of him?
• Look up verse 18 in several translations.  Where is the Levite headed?  The Hebrew literally has "House of Yahweh" but the best Greek texts have "my house".  The Greek texts were translated before the time of Jesus (about 125 BC), and the Hebrew texts were consolidated shortly thereafter (about AD 125).  Considering the Greek texts are older, but still translations, which reading makes more sense to you and why?
• After the old man and the Levite eat and drink, the "sons of belial" show up (read verse 22 in the KJV).  They want the man who has come, not the concubine or his servant.  This is supposed to horrify, and it should at least make us terribly uncomfortable.  It would be analogous to "zombies" in our culture.  The old man goes out to them, and has a plea and an alternative.  What do you think of his alternative?
• Every translation seems to have a different way to translate the final word of verse 23 (also used in verse 24).  You can find the Strong's entry here.  It's always moral, and points out the stupidity of disobeying God.  The Greek word used in the same place can be found in the Strong's here. What do you think about what the old man is telling them? How effective do you think he's being?
• The Levite then takes matters into his own hands.  He puts his concubine outside and drags the old man back in.  What do you think is going through his mind that, after working to get her back, he now does this?
• The concubine is "abused" in the most horrible fashion by the crowd.  Why do you think they seemed satisfied by this rather than to continue to seek the man?
• She survives the abuse all night, only to die in the morning on the threshold.  Again, this seems like a scene from a horror flick, another literary device by the author to increase the revulsion in his readers/listeners.  Her "master" doesn't realize she's dead, at first.  What do you think of him as he simply tells her to get up?
• The Levite takes her home, cuts her up into 12 pieces, and sends them out to the 12 tribes of Israel.  If he sent 12 pieces out, then what do you think the fact that Benjamin also received a piece?
• There was no UPS or FedEx in those days.  So how do you think this guy gets 12 pieces of his dead concubine to hither and yon (and without refrigeration, smelly)?  Who could he use as couriers?
•  The people of Israel are horrified (as we would expect with all the heightened horrifying tension of the writer). Now, it's on them to act.  Why do you think the Levite chose to respond to this catastrophe this way?

Chapter 20

•  All the tribes, "from Dan to Beersheba" are summoned before God at Mizpah. First off, if "Dan" (the farthest northern city of Israel) is mentioned as a boundary of Israel, then when do you think this chapter happens in relation to the previous account of the Levite, idols, and the migrating tribe of Dan? 
• Look up the word used for the "leaders" of the people here. Only metaphorically are the leaders "corner towers". In what way do you think this metaphor works for leadership in general?
• Israel musters 400,000 from the tribes.  Notice that Benjamin hears about the muster, but doesn't show up.  What do you think that means for Benjamin?  Why do you think they wouldn't show up when no one even seems to know what it's about?  Or, do they?
• The Levite stands and tells the account of what happened in Gibeah.  In his account, who rises against him?  Instead of "men", the Hebrew word used is "ba'al", which typically means lords or rulers.  Why do you think the Levite characterizes those who surrounded the house, those "sons of belial", as leaders of the city?
• He claims that they intended to kill him, but instead raped his concubine and she died.  What do you think of his version of what happened?
• He then admits to cutting up his concubine and sending her out to all Israel, but what do you think of his motivation?  How is the foolish disobedience of Gibeah a good reason to send body parts all over the country?
• Now the Levite throws the decision of what to do on the 11 tribes present.  What do you think of his process?
• The people are outraged, and decide to do something right then (no one return to his tent).  They will cast lots, taking 1 in 10, 10 in 100, and 100 in 1000 to make provision for the people. What do you think this means?  
• The people of Israel give Benjamin a chance to come forward with the "sons of belial".  Why do you think Benjamin refuses to listen to the rest of the tribes and give up these evil people?  How might that influence your understanding of them as "leaders" (ba-al)?
• Benjamin number 26,000 men, seven hundred of them are left-handed slingers who can hit a hair without missing.  Why do you think all the cities of Benjamin turn out to defend the evil people of Gibeah?
• Israel numbers 400,000 "men drawing the sword".  So, who got left behind in the "lottery" of tenths?
• The people go to Bethel and inquire of God there.  The ark is said to be there, and the priest before the ark is the grand son of Aaron.  So, this would be pretty early on in the days of the sons of Israel.  How does this help revise or inform your sense of when, in Israel's history, this happened?
• The people inquire of God, and He answers saying Judah goes up first.  And they lose.  In fact, they lose more men than Benjamin puts in the field.  If they truly heard from God, and Benjamin is truly evil, then why do you think they lost?  What does that tell you about "hearing from God" today?
• They inquire of God again, and God tells them to go up and fight.  They go, and lose...again! They heard from God, Benjamin is evil, and they lose.  So, what do you think is going on here spiritually?  Is the Devil beating God?  What does this mean to you, all these failures?
• Now the people fast and offer sacrifices to God.  They inquire again, but now the answer isn't just go, but a promise of victory.  How does this inform your prayer life?  What does this tell you of God's character that He would send them into battle twice to lose?
• This time they set an ambush.  There's nothing to indicate it was God's idea, but this time it seems to work.  But, now we have two different parallel accounts of this battle.  Read verses 31 through the first half of 36 aloud.  Then read the second half of verse 36 through 46 aloud.  There is a connection in Benjamin not seeing the evil about to touch them (v.34) and the evil touching them (v.41), but it's hard to spot in most translations.  Instead, notice the level of detail between the two accounts.  They are clearly of the same event.  Why do you think the author keeps both?
• The people of Israel defeat Benjamin in the field, and trap 600 of them on a rock, all that's left of the 26,000.  Why do you think the people of Israel then turn and destroy the cities of Benjamin?  What do you think that was about?

That should more than suffice for our time together Thursday.  Remember to consider your walk with Jesus in light of what this account says about the character of God, and His way of working with His people.