Some believe this section of Isaiah was written late, during the time of Daniel, others that it was written early, foreshadowing their eventual return. I think it was written by a remnant of a 'school' of prophets first started/run by Isaiah during the exile. I'm not sure if they would have been located in Jerusalem or in exile, but the romantic in me likes the thought of Jerusalem (the least likely option). That would mean the writers wrote from the rubble of Jerusalem words of hope to the exiles in a pagan land.
Anyway, read the chapter through several times. This is poetry, not the usual narrative texts we have studied so far, so you can expect to find a LOT more peculiarities and variety in translations. Translating poetry from one language to another is the most difficult sort of translation (that and humor probably tie). The problem is the poetic 'license' and 'imagery' used are not to be understood literally. This is usually handled well in most translations; but read it in several translations, and consider the differences and what they might mean.
After reading it through a few times, go back over it considering these questions:
- Consider the audience in the opening lines. 'Comfort' is an imperative (command), and it's plural. Consider who is to be comforted. What is the goal, at the outset, of the writer, and of God through the writer?
- In verse 3 through 5, do you think the audience has remained the exiles?
- Who winds up being the 'voice' referred to in verse 3?
- Who is the highway for? So, 'who's coming to dinner' so to speak? So, why do you think it would be difficult for modern Jews to deny so vehemently that the Messiah could be deity?
- Verses 6 through 8 (possibly through 11) there is a dialogue. The content of the 'crying out' is two fold (if the dialog extends through verse 11), so how do you think the two pieces relate? Why do you think they were combined here?
- There are at least two elements of God's character described between verse 12 and 17. His holiness and his glory seem to be the main things in these verses. Why do you think the audience needs to hear that? How do these elements of God's character affect you hearing/reading them like this?
- In verses 18 through 26, the worship involving idols is really addressed well. Why do you think this needs to be addressed, either with the exiles or with the people left in Judah?
- What do you see as the major contrast between idol worship and worship of God?
- Considering the 'resume' of God in verses 21 through 26, what problem do you think this addressing with the audience? What are they supposed to have known 'from the foundations of the earth', and why do you think they might have forgotten it?
- Verses 27 through 31 are the most famous of this chapter, especially 31. It begins with a 'quote' either from the exiles or the people in Jerusalem/Judah. Considering that the way the poetry is structured the focus of the quote is on the 'justice' and 'pathway' of the one speaking, what is the danger of such a focus on our justice and our way of life?
- How do you think knowing that God is never tired and His understanding is unsearchable helps people in bad circumstances?
- The things the audience wants, power and strength, find their source somewhere other than youth. Why do you think the people needed to know this? Why might you?
- What does it mean to you or what would it look like for you to 'wait expectantly' for God? Why would do that renew your strength? How do you think that 'works' or is that even the right question to ask?
No comments:
Post a Comment