So, part of our problems will be how to apply these peculiarities to our life today. If it's so difficult to see what Paul's talking about then, it will be extremely hard to come up with what we need to carry forward 2,000 years to our church life today. I'm confident we'll find something, but it will be very interesting to discover what.
Read through the chapter in as many translations as you have. I know this takes time, but there isn't a better practice that will bring linguistic issues to the forefront. Even as I translate, I still have about 6 versions right there to look at while I'm doing it; it helps to spot inconsistencies or consistencies in translation. Differences are good places to ask questions or make some further investigation, like with a Strong's.
After reading through several times, jotting down notes and questions, read through again with the questions below:
- Do you think Paul is being 'truthful' in verse 2? Do they really 'remember him'? Do they really hold firmly to traditions? Has he given any examples of that either in previous chapters or in this one?
- Do you think there is a 'progression' in verse 3? Does it go 'Christ, man, woman'? What about God?
- The word 'head' is used twice in verse 4, do you think Paul is referring to the man's literal head both times? Why or why not? (you may need to think about this verse in light of verse 3 to answer)
- Not only is 'head' used twice in verse 5, but clearly a literal head is in view because of 'shaved', and 'shorn' in verse 6. But do you think her literal head is 'disgraced'? Why or why not? (again, consider verse 3 and then verse 7)
- Read Genesis 1:27. What do you think of Paul's allusion to this verse in verse 7? Do you think his argument makes sense as he applies Gen 1:27 to this issue of head-coverings?
- Verses 8 and 9 originate out of the Genesis 2 creation story (Gen 2:20-24). What do you think of Paul's use of those verses here?
- From verses 7 through 9, Paul clearly refers to the creation account in Genesis. Why do you think he would go there for this issue?
- You really need to look at verse 10 in at least a King James or New King James translation. Then look at a New International or New American Standard version. If you have it, look at the whole passage in the New Revised Standard. All these translations work over verse 10 differently. Note especially the 'italics' where a word is added that does not appear in the Greek text. Read the verse through without the italicized words. What do you think might be an alternative meaning after reading it that way?
- Do you think verses 11 and 12 soften Paul's stance on women in church, or do they simply reveal his true belief which lies behind what he writes here? Why do you think any such distinction is important, both to us and to the church in Corinth?
- In verses 13 through 15, does Paul truly support his view of head covering with his point about hair? Have you ever seen a picture of Jesus with short hair? Any of the apostles? Ever? What do you think he's referring to here?
- Since Roman customs seemed to include men with what we would consider 'short hair', it might be easy to say this is local for Corinth, a Roman colony. But do you think we can really do that considering verse 16?
- Switching gears, he says, 'But in giving this instruction, I do not praise you...' What instruction, the one he concluded, or the one coming up? And if the one concluded, why would he start it with a statement that seems to imply he does praise them? If the one coming up, then what do you make of the 'praise' in verse 2?
- Read 1 Corinthians 1:10 and 11. Why do you think Paul would put 'in part' about his belief of 'divisions' when he's already covered some of them? What might that mean for this particular issue?
- After criticizing their 'divisions' at the beginning of the letter, he now claims they are necessary? What do you think he means by that?
- In their practice of the Lord's Supper, Paul says it has stopped being the Lord's Supper. Why do you think that would be the case?
- Paul describes what they are doing in verses 21 and 22. How would you describe what they are doing? For instance, where do you think this happens? Try, as best as you can, to remove your own 21st Century practice out of the mix, and imagine what is happening.
- Paul repeats for them what he had delivered to them when he was there. Where does he say he got it? What do you think he means by 'I received from the Lord...' since he wasn't a disciple of Jesus?
- Paul uses a word 'remembrance' in his quotes of Jesus in verses 24 and 25. Look it up here. What do you think could be another or even better English word choice?
- What do you think about Paul's point of the Lord's Supper in verse 26? Is that what it's all about to you?
- What is Paul's claim that to eat the Lord's Supper in an 'unworthy manner' is guilty of the body and blood of the Lord tied back to? Why does that make you guilty of the body and blood of the Lord?
- Look up the word, 'examine' here. What other English words would work well here?
- What do you think you should be looking for in this examination?
- What are the consequences for not examining yourself as you take the Lord's Supper?
- Considering the consequences, what do you make of verse 32? Do you think Paul is saying it's for our own good when we die because we take the Lord's Supper unworthily?
- Paul applies this to the specific practice in Corinth in verses 33 and 34. How do you think we should apply it in our worship?
No comments:
Post a Comment