Of Cups, of Memories, and of Future Glory

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting February 9 to study as far as we get between Luke 22:14 through 38.  Chances are good that we won't get through the bread and cups (yes, cups).

Read this passage through several times.  The parallels in Matthew 26 and Mark 14 are also helpful.  John covers the same time frame in chapters 13 through 16.  It's possible the prayer of John 17 was also said in the upper room.  Reading at least John 13 is probably very helpful as well, since it explains some things missing in Matthew, Mark, and Luke.

Be sure as you read to make notes, especially questions.  If you have access to a book (large or small) about how the Passover goes, it will be helpful here.  A Bible handbook (big, thorough one) might have a succinct treatment of the Passover as well. Luke's sequence is not quite the same as the others, so pay attention to the differences.

The remainder through verse 38 of Luke are made up of small discourses.  The questions below will take them individually.  You may find it useful to consider them that way, but commentaries will differ in how they do that, if they even do.

After gaining your own notes and commentary examination, then go back through with the questions below:

• Luke uses the term "apostles" here instead of disciples.  Prior to this he uses "the Twelve" or disciples.  It's possible that he has a technical reason for this or is making some other point.  What reason do you think Luke has for referring to the twelve disciples of Jesus as "apostles" here?
• Luke begins Jesus' discourse with His looking forward to when they celebrate it again in the "final kingdom" of God.  Matthew and Mark both have it at the end.  Why do you think Luke would put that at the beginning?
• Luke has Jesus passing around a cup, having given thanks, before the bread.  There's some question about when, during a traditional Passover meal, this might happen, and exactly which of 4 cups of wine Jesus shares first (thanksgiving).  In any case, there are two cups before the "bread" and two after.  So why do you think Luke makes a point of including this first cup?
• There is some debate about whether the practice of the Passover in the first century used a 3-pocket bag for the unleavened bread.  But regardless, bread was broken in the course of the meal.  Jesus' use of this to refer to His physical suffering changes the meaning from what it was in the meal.  To what do you think Jesus refers with the bread, and why do you think it is so important for us to remember?
• Jesus then shares a cup, again of memorial.  This though, signifies something completely different.  The final two cups of wine in a more modern tradition are the cup of Elijah and the final cup.  Again debate exists as to which cup Jesus uses to signify His blood.  The practice in the first century could have been very different from what we have today.  But which one makes more sense to you, the cup of Elijah or the final cup? (you're going to need to do some research to get at the difference on this one)
• Jesus then reveals He is going to be betrayed.  What do you think it means when Jesus He is going where it has been determined but still "woe" on His betrayer?  Why, if it's determined (think, "necessary") is the one betraying Him in such trouble?  (this was brought up last week)
• Only Matthew has Judas asking Jesus if it's him (like everyone else asks, but this time to see whether Jesus really knew or not).  Jesus responds there with an enigmatic statement.  Considering that Jesus washes Judas' feet and Judas is part of the meal, what do you think Jesus is doing for Judas by including him in all of that?  
• As they were looking back, what do you think Jesus' treatment of Judas meant to the Twelve, you know, "upon reflection"? What can you tell from what they remember and relate about Jesus' treatment of Judas in the Gospels?
• The disciples begin to discuss among themselves who might be the one betraying Jesus, which makes sense.  But then their questioning breaks out into an argument about which one is the "greatest".  Imagine you're in the room with them.  What do you hear?  What are they saying, and how do they get from asking about the betrayer to asserting their own greatness?  What do you learn about yourself and human beings from this exercise?
• Only Luke has Jesus comments about greatness right here in the upper room discourse.  Although John 13 has something very similar here related to Jesus' washing of the disciple's feet.  How does John 13 help you with Jesus' statements recorded here in Luke?  
• Only Luke has Jesus next comment about the apostles sitting on thrones judging the 12 tribes of Israel.  But read verses 28 through 30 in several translations (Blue Letter Bible may help here).  Look particularly at how 29 is connected to 30.  So, what do you think?  Is Jesus promising the twelve a kingdom, just as He Himself has been appointed one by the Father?
• In verses 31, Jesus begins speaking to Peter about his denial.  Only Mark do we have this statement about satan requesting to "sift" him.  The way it's worded (and the context supports this), the implication is that God granted satan's request.  Why do you think God would do that?
• Jesus prays for Peter that his faith may not fail.  Considering Jesus' next comment about Peter's "return" what do you think Jesus means by praying for Peter's faith not to fail?
• Jesus seems to know what Peter will face, and yet still gives him a job to do afterwards.  He knows how it will go, but that does not disqualify Peter for service (at least not after he returns).  What does that tell you about Jesus' thoughts on qualifications for ministering?
• In the other Gospels, Peter claims his faithfulness in the Garden (Mount of Olives).  In Luke and John, they haven't left just yet.  How important is this detail to you?
• In Matthew and Mark, the other disciples claim faithfulness as well along with Peter.  This detail is missing from Luke and John.  Is it sort of assumed in the other two, or do you think there's some reason it didn't make it in?
• Read Matthew 26:34, Mark 14:30, Luke 22:34, and John 13:38.  How many times does the rooster crow before Peter denies Jesus?  Write that down.  Now read Mark 14:66 - 72.  Why do you think Mark would have such a precisely numbered detail?  (who was Mark's source again?)
• Only Luke has the detail about the twelve disciples/apostles now being "equipped" and Jesus contrasts that with when they were sent out as 12 and 72 taking no provisions.  Why do you think things are different now?
• Jesus tells them to sell a coat and buy a sword.  What do you think that is about?
• Jesus' explanation about the sword is because it has been foretold that He will be numbered (accounted) among "lawless" ones (outlaw?).  Why do you think that makes a sword necessary?
• The disciples already have two swords (for 12 men?), and Jesus says that's sufficient.  Why, if they are supposed to sell their coat and buy a sword, are 2 swords sufficient for 12 men?

 That's going to take us a while to get through, so get comfy!

Don't forget to look at what these things mean for your own walk with Jesus.  How does the Passover celebration and Jesus' changes reveal something of your relationship with Him, and His love for you?

And Jesus' dealing with Peter and the other disciples, how does that help you better understand your relationship with Jesus? 

Examining Self-Examination Within A Group of Other-Examiners

This is the study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study meeting September 18 to study the rest of 1 Corinthians 11.  It's taken about 2 weeks to finally get to this passage, but I believe we can finally get some of this covered.  It's important stuff.

Read through the whole chapter again at least once.  Then focus on verses 17 through the end.  This is specifically about the Lord's Supper/Communion and the problems with their practice.  The exact details are sketchy, so read carefully.  Try and get a sense of what was happening when they practiced the Supper.  Pay specific attention to differences from the way we practice today.

After you've read through the passage several times, jotting down your own observations and questions to bring to the group, read through again with the questions below:

• Switching gears, he says, 'But in giving this instruction, I do not praise you...'  What instruction, the one he concluded, or the one coming up?  And if the one concluded, why would he start it with a statement that seems to imply he does praise them?  If the one coming up, then what do you make of the 'praise' in verse 2?
• Read 1 Corinthians 1:10 and 11.  Why do you think Paul would put 'in part' about his belief of 'divisions' when he's already covered some of them?  What might that mean for this particular issue?
• After criticizing their 'divisions' at the beginning of the letter, he now claims they are necessary?  What do you think he means by that?
• In their practice of the Lord's Supper, Paul says it has stopped being the Lord's Supper.  Why do you think that would be the case?
• Paul describes what they are doing in verses 21 and 22.  How would you describe what they are doing?  For instance, where do you think this happens?  Try, as best as you can, to remove your own 21st Century practice out of the mix, and imagine what is happening.
• Paul repeats for them what he had delivered to them when he was there.  Where does he say he got it?  What do you think he means by 'I received from the Lord...' since he wasn't a disciple of Jesus?
• Paul uses a word 'remembrance' in his quotes of Jesus in verses 24 and 25. Look it up here.  What do you think could be another or even better English word choice?
• What do you think about Paul's point of the Lord's Supper in verse 26?  Is that what it's all about to you?
• What is Paul's claim that to eat the Lord's Supper in an 'unworthy manner' is guilty of the body and blood of the Lord tied back to?  Why does that make you guilty of the body and blood of the Lord?
• Look up the word, 'examine' here.  What other English words would work well here?
• What do you think you should be looking for in this examination?
• What are the consequences for not examining yourself as you take the Lord's Supper?
• Considering the consequences, what do you make of verse 32?  Do you think Paul is saying it's for our own good when we die because we take the Lord's Supper unworthily?
• Paul applies this to the specific practice in Corinth in verses 33 and 34.  How do you think we should apply it in our worship?

That should/may keep us occupied for an hour.  After this it's on to expression of 'gifts'.  Hopefully this will enlighten us about our own practice since this is a very common practice among modern churches, where gifts are more controversial than common.

Worship Problems, From Head Gear to Meal Ettiquette

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Group meeting September 4 to study 1 Corinthians 11.  This is a somewhat weird chapter, at least it begins weird.  The first verse actually goes with chapter 10, the first issue is very confusing after 2,000 years of cultural change, and the second issue seems to refer to a practice of the Lord's Supper we no longer use, and no one seems to remember.

So, part of our problems will be how to apply these peculiarities to our life today.  If it's so difficult to see what Paul's talking about then, it will be extremely hard to come up with what we need to carry forward 2,000 years to our church life today.  I'm confident we'll find something, but it will be very interesting to discover what.

Read through the chapter in as many translations as you have.  I know this takes time, but there isn't a better practice that will bring linguistic issues to the forefront.  Even as I translate, I still have about 6 versions right there to look at while I'm doing it; it helps to spot inconsistencies or consistencies in translation.  Differences are good places to ask questions or make some further investigation, like with a Strong's.

After reading through several times, jotting down notes and questions, read through again with the questions below:

• Do you think Paul is being 'truthful' in verse 2?  Do they really 'remember him'?  Do they really hold firmly to traditions?  Has he given any examples of that either in previous chapters or in this one?
• Do you think there is a 'progression' in verse 3?  Does it go 'Christ, man, woman'? What about God?
• The word 'head' is used twice in verse 4, do you think Paul is referring to the man's literal head both times?  Why or why not? (you may need to think about this verse in light of verse 3 to answer)
• Not only is 'head' used twice in verse 5, but clearly a literal head is in view because of 'shaved', and 'shorn' in verse 6.  But do you think her literal head is 'disgraced'?  Why or why not? (again, consider verse 3 and then verse 7)
• Read Genesis 1:27.  What do you think of Paul's allusion to this verse in verse 7?  Do you think his argument makes sense as he applies Gen 1:27 to this issue of head-coverings?
• Verses 8 and 9 originate out of the Genesis 2 creation story (Gen 2:20-24).  What do you think of Paul's use of those verses here?
• From verses 7 through 9, Paul clearly refers to the creation account in Genesis.  Why do you think he would go there for this issue?
• You really need to look at verse 10 in at least a King James or New King James translation.  Then look at a New International or New American Standard version.  If you have it, look at the whole passage in the New Revised Standard.  All these translations work over verse 10 differently.  Note especially the 'italics' where a word is added that does not appear in the Greek text.  Read the verse through without the italicized words.  What do you think might be an alternative meaning after reading it that way?
• Do you think verses 11 and 12 soften Paul's stance on women in church, or do they simply reveal his true belief which lies behind what he writes here?  Why do you think any such distinction is important, both to us and to the church in Corinth?
• In verses 13 through 15, does Paul truly support his view of head covering with his point about hair?  Have you ever seen a picture of Jesus with short hair?  Any of the apostles?  Ever?  What do you think he's referring to here? 
• Since Roman customs seemed to include men with what we would consider 'short hair', it might be easy to say this is local for Corinth, a Roman colony.  But do you think we can really do that considering verse 16?
• Switching gears, he says, 'But in giving this instruction, I do not praise you...'  What instruction, the one he concluded, or the one coming up?  And if the one concluded, why would he start it with a statement that seems to imply he does praise them?  If the one coming up, then what do you make of the 'praise' in verse 2?
• Read 1 Corinthians 1:10 and 11.  Why do you think Paul would put 'in part' about his belief of 'divisions' when he's already covered some of them?  What might that mean for this particular issue?
• After criticizing their 'divisions' at the beginning of the letter, he now claims they are necessary?  What do you think he means by that?
• In their practice of the Lord's Supper, Paul says it has stopped being the Lord's Supper.  Why do you think that would be the case?
• Paul describes what they are doing in verses 21 and 22.  How would you describe what they are doing?  For instance, where do you think this happens?  Try, as best as you can, to remove your own 21st Century practice out of the mix, and imagine what is happening.
• Paul repeats for them what he had delivered to them when he was there.  Where does he say he got it?  What do you think he means by 'I received from the Lord...' since he wasn't a disciple of Jesus?
• Paul uses a word 'remembrance' in his quotes of Jesus in verses 24 and 25. Look it up here.  What do you think could be another or even better English word choice?
• What do you think about Paul's point of the Lord's Supper in verse 26?  Is that what it's all about to you?
• What is Paul's claim that to eat the Lord's Supper in an 'unworthy manner' is guilty of the body and blood of the Lord tied back to?  Why does that make you guilty of the body and blood of the Lord?
• Look up the word, 'examine' here.  What other English words would work well here?
• What do you think you should be looking for in this examination?
• What are the consequences for not examining yourself as you take the Lord's Supper?
• Considering the consequences, what do you make of verse 32?  Do you think Paul is saying it's for our own good when we die because we take the Lord's Supper unworthily?
• Paul applies this to the specific practice in Corinth in verses 33 and 34.  How do you think we should apply it in our worship?

That should keep us plenty busy Thursday.  I hope you can make good use of the extra day to study.  This is a perplexing chapter, so let's puzzle over it together!

Life Lessons from Israel and Communion

This is the study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting August 28 to study 1 Corinthians 10.  This chapter possibly wraps up the topic of 'eating food sacrificed to idols'.  It has lots of interesting pieces to it including an assessment/application of Israel's history to current church life.  It contains several familiar verses, but I'll bet this is the first time most of us have really dug through the context of them.

Read through the chapter several times, jotting down observations and questions.  Look through several translations, and note areas of disagreement.  Also, bring different translations to the group - like the different one we had last week.  That helps us all get different perspectives. 

After reading through and making your own notes/questions, read through again using the questions below:

• Paul points out the 'unity' of experience of the people of Israel in the desert (vs. 1-4), but notes that God was not pleased with them.  What counter-argument do you think he is trying to undermine with that statement (it's all one sentence in Greek)?  What do you think the believers in Corinth were saying that needed this to correct?
• Paul begins to site their faults as 'examples'.  Keeping in mind the passages so far in this letter, why do you think Paul chose these items as examples?
• Which of those that Paul chose do you think still apply to church today?
• Paul thinks he lives at the end of the age (v. 11).  In what ways might he have been right?
• After the illustrations from Israel's history, then he puts in the verse about temptation (v. 13), but not before his challenge to those who think they stand.  Why do you think he's 'building' his argument right here this way?  What do you think he's arguing against in the church in Corinth?
• We have been told that we are to flee immorality as a sin, but here we are told to also feel idolatry.  Why do you think we hear so much about the one, but not the other in our churches today?
• Paul now applies these things to the Lord's Supper.  This is why we call it "Communion", we all partake together from the same thing.  Paul acknowledges that this unifies the church, but what do you think he sees as the 'additional lesson' they should have taken from it?
• In verse 22, what lesson from Israel do you think Paul might be referring back to?
• What do you think Paul means in verse 23?  Are all things truly 'permissible' or 'lawful'?
• Now Paul lays down some specific direction.  Who do you think this direction is for? Who do you think this direction is supposed to affect?  Why do you think Paul may have switched his 'victim' here at the end?  Or do you think he did?
• How do you think all this changes or modifies your understanding of verse 31?  Or has it?
• What are some ways we can apply the ending principle of verses 32-33 in our lives/church?

That should keep us busy for at least an hour.  Remember to bring your own notes to share.