Read this passage through, and even complete the chapter (Triumphal Entry) to get a sense of what's happening. Try reading this passage keeping the two segments separate, and then try it again tying them together (Jesus with children when the ruler shows up). Use a few translations to see what translation differences there are. As always, make notes, jot down questions. If you haven't seen this feature of Blue Letter Bible yet, Strong's is tied to more than the KJV now. You can reference Strong's with the New American Standard Bible, the English Standard Version, and even the Holman Christian Standard Bible. This makes checking out those translation differences a lot easier.
After you make notes and questions, then refer to some commentary references. Again, the Blue Letter Bible has some nice ones. Commentaries can be good options, but so can sermon notes, study guides, and other references. Use these to answer some of your questions, revise your notes, and come up with other questions. After you've done this work yourself, go back through with the questions below:
- In this account in Luke, babies are being brought to Jesus. In other accounts (Matthew 19 and Mark 10) the word is "children" which refers to ones who could walk. Later in verse 16, Jesus uses the world for "children" again. Why do you think Luke refers to "babies" rather than children? Could there have been more than one event or someone remembered it differently?
- Jesus says that the Kingdom of God belongs to (is of these) children. What does that mean to you? How do you think the Kingdom of God belongs to children?
- Jesus then strengthens His meaning when He says that unless someone receives the Kingdom as a child they can't enter. How do you think you receive or accept the Kingdom of God like a child would? If you have a young child, what would that look like for them, how would they do it?
- If you haven't, read the account of the "Ruler" in Matthew 19:16-22 and Mark 10:17-22. In Luke's account the man is initially just a "ruler". In fact, he's not referred to as "young" in Luke's or Mark's account. Why do you think Matthew remembered him "young"?
- All of the accounts have Jesus saying, "Why call Me good, no one is good but God." Why do you think Jesus says this to the "ruler"?
- Of the three accounts, Luke has the shortest list of laws. Why do you think that might be?
- The man says in all accounts that he's done these from his youth (all his life). With Luke's list, this might be possible, even with Mark's list. But with Matthew's list? What do you think of this person's claim to have lived this life this way?
- Jesus then sees his problem: his wealth. If this man knows he's lived his life according to the law, why do you think he still needs to ask Jesus about how to inherit eternal life?
- Jesus addresses the stumbling block in his life, the man's wealth. But what does he also forfeit when he gives up everything and follows Jesus?
- Jesus tells him to give everything to the poor in order to get treasure in heaven and come follow Him. Considering the man's initial question, what about the idea of "treasure swapping" should have been attractive to the "ruler"?
- In some translations, Jesus is grieved when the man is grieved. There is good evidence both ways. Why do you think Jesus would be "grieved" that the ruler left grieved?
- Jesus says that it's hard for the wealthy to enter the kingdom of heaven. Considering wealth on a global scale, most Americans are wealthy. What do you think this means for us and our culture?
- The people who hear Jesus (in Matthew and Mark, His disciples) are astonished. In all three accounts, camels go through needles easier than rich people enter heaven. What point do you think Jesus is making to the astonished people?
- In all three accounts Peter points out that they have left all that. Why do you think Peter is making that point?
- Jesus responds to Peter that all who sacrifice much will gain much, and eventually, eternal life. So what do you think of Jesus' claim they will gain it all back and more in this life? Or do you think He meant something different? If so, what?
No comments:
Post a Comment