Dealing With Pharisees Part I: Testing The Teacher

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting August 4 to study Luke 13:31-14:6.  I believe that I told everyone last Thursday that the "Dinner Party" started in verse 7, but I was wrong.  Chapter 14 verses 1 through 24 are the same "dinner party" in Luke.  So, we'll begin it this week and finish it next.

It will be helpful to read the context of this dinner party.  It forms one event in Luke, but could possibly have been a composite of several dinners with any number of hosts.  Luke has this as one event, which is also a possibility.  Either way, Jesus is not all that comfortable a guest to have in the house of this particular host.  He eventually insults the host and the other guests, thoroughly.

Read through the passage (this part, and the rest through 24 for context) several times.  Try and get a sense of the setting.  Journey, Pharisees coming to Jesus to warn Him about Herod, and then a chief of theirs invites Him to dinner.  How nice.  Everyone seems to be getting along.  Make notes from the perspective of yourself standing among the crowd witnessing this.  Including looking in on the dinner party as they recline with some diseased person standing there with them (how does that look in your mind?).  Make notes on what you see, what you hear, who is doing what, and why.

After you gone through your own observation journey, perhaps read it through in different translations, then maybe read a commentary or two.  See if that helps to define the scene better for you.  Adjust your notes and questions accordingly.

Then go back through with the questions below:

• Luke is clear to point out the immediacy of the next event.  Why do you think Luke would tie the Pharisees warning so closely with the previous statements?
• They warn that Herod wants to kill Jesus.  How likely, based on the crucifixion account later, do you think it is that they are right?
• Jesus responds that He must go to Jerusalem, because no prophet can die outside of the city.  While that's not strictly true, what do you think Jesus is getting at?
• Jesus has to cast out demons and perform cures on His way, but look at the timing.  To what do you think Jesus may be referring in His "third day" reference?
• Jesus then prophesies over Jerusalem in the form of a lament.  How do you feel about Jesus' words?  What emotions do they evoke for you?
• Jesus has wanted to gather the city like chicks under the wings of a mother hen.  As people hear this, what do you think they think about His words?  What do you think this sounds like? See if you can find a reference to this imagery in the Hebrew Scriptures (Hen gathering her chicks).
• What do you think Jesus' last comment refers to, His Triumphal Entry or His eventual appearing later? 
• Jesus then enters the house of one of the leaders of the Pharisees.  How possible do you think it is that the preceding account was some sort of test?  What do you think the connection is?
• The "Guests" are watching Jesus very closely with a diseased person standing there.  He's obviously a plant (a human planted intentionally at the scene, not a shrub).  Jesus has already healed on the Sabbath several times already in Luke, so why would they be watching for what shouldn't really surprise them?  Have they not heard Jesus defend healing on the Sabbath before?  Don't these guys talk to each other?
• The man has a disease referred to in the KJV as "dropsy" and many other translations have picked this term as well.  Other modern versions call it "swelling".  Look up the word here in the Blue Letter Bible site.  What do you think it means, and what problems do you see in figuring that out?
• Jesus asks the guests (lawyers and Pharisees) about the legality before He heals.  Why do you think He would do that?
• They remains silent when asked about the legality.  Considering that Pharisees and lawyers don't always agree on things, why do you think they might have remained silent?
• Jesus heals the man and send him away.  Then starts the discussion.  What does it tell you about Jesus that He heals and sends him away first, then discusses it?
• Jesus then asks, who doesn't pull a son or a cow (really? cow?) out of a well on the Sabbath.  Again no one says a thing.  What is interesting to you about His question?  Consider His previous questions (13:15-16 for example), what is different here?
• They could not give an answer.  The NIV says they had nothing to say, but other translations state they were not able, and the Greek reads that way.  What do you think it means that they could not answer, why not?

That should keep us busy for some time.  Remember to be looking for the AHA moments as you read.  Let this stuff sink into your heart and remember it's for you in your walk with Jesus.  Let His Spirit interpret for you what He wants to reveal about you.  These are growth opportunities, let's grab them!

Seeing Things God's Way

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting July 7 to study Luke 13:1-17.  This begins the thirteenth chapter finally.  We'll be looking at a teaching, a parable, and a healing.  Some commentaries think they're separate (at least the healing from the parable/teaching), but I think there's a common connection.

Read through the passage in a few different translations, jot down notes and questions, and then check out some commentaries.  Revise your notes and questions if necessary, and then go through the questions below:

• Current events were circulated by word-of-mouth in that day, so the report in verse 1 isn't unusual or surprising in a sense.  It's even expected since everyone knew Jesus was from Galilee and would think He'd want to know.  So why do you think He responds so negatively?
• Jesus hears their report and begins challenging a belief that "things happen in proportion to the degree of sin of the people who suffer in it".  Jesus instead puts everyone in the same "sin-bucket".  Why do you think people would believe that sin drives the degree of suffering?
• Jesus says, "repent or perish", this sounds pretty strong and in the context, people actually died.  So, what do you think Jesus meant by this warning?
• What do you think it means to "repent"?
• In the context of the report, Jesus simply tells people to repent, but doesn't explicitly tell them from what (except the belief that suffering is directly related to the degree of sinfulness in a persons' life).  What do you think Jesus had in mind for them to repent from and to?
• The parable of the fig tree happens in a vineyard.  In their day this wasn't that unusual, and vineyards often are imagery for Israel, so what do you think the fig tree represented in parable?
• Who is the vineyard owner?  Who is the vinedresser/vineyard keeper/gardener/vineyard worker?
• If the tree has one more year, what do you think this means for the "fig tree"?
• So, if the problem the fig tree has is producing figs, what do you think this means for those needing to repent?  What do you think they need to do to survive after the year?
• If (and I believe it does) the parable related to the need for repentance, then what do you infer from it about repentance?  What do you think it teaches about what repentance means?  What do you learn about repentance for your own life?
• Immediately it's the Sabbath, and Jesus is teaching in the synagogue.  What do you think it means that Jesus is allowed or asked to teach in a synagogue?  Why do you think He would be allowed to do that when His popularity with the religious leaders is on the decline?
• Jesus sees a woman who is bent over and it is from spiritual oppression.  He heals her, but not with the wording associated with casting out demons.  So, what do you think was going on with the woman?
• Jesus calls her over to Him (up front), declares her healed, and then touches her.  Why do you think He healed her this way?
• The synagogue leader cites the law about abstaining from your occupation on the Sabbath.  What do you infer about what he believes about Jesus' occupation?  What do you think is Jesus' occupation?
• The synagogue leader doesn't address Jesus, he addresses the crowd.  Who do you think he had a problem with?
• Jesus wastes no time in calling out the legal problem.  Do you think the leaders would have considered animals more important than this woman?  So why would such exceptions be made for animals but not for people?  What sort of "healing" was going on besides Jesus that they would have prohibited its exercise on the Sabbath?
• Jesus points out the problem of priority in the oral tradition or explanation of the law.  What do you think God intends for the Sabbath?  What is it supposed to be about?
• His "opponents" were humiliated.  What does that tell you about those in attendance?
• Why do you think the crowd would be so favorable when the leaders were humiliated?  Why wouldn't that bother the crowd?

That should keep us busy.  Remember to apply the "Awakening", "Honesty", and "Action" process to find the application the Holy Spirit has for you in this passage.  What would repentance look like for you?

What Is Work Anyway?

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting November 19 to study Luke 6:1-11.  This passage is made up of two run-ins between Jesus and the teachers of His day.  The problem they have is Sabbath-Keeping rules.  There is a huge cultural issue at stake for the Jews with this, and internal debate is very hot in Jesus' day.  So be sure to research Sabbath rules, and particularly during and after the Maccabean Revolt.

Read through the passage a few times jotting down questions and observations.  Look up the Sabbath article in the ISBE on the Blue Letter Bible site (see link above), and pay close attention to II.2. in that entry.  After you have your own set of questions and observations, then go to any commentary you can find (including those on the BLB site).  From them you may find answers, additional observations, and additional questions.  Jot those down too and bring them Thursday.

After having done your own study, go back through with the questions below:

• If the disciples were plucking, rubbing, and eating the heads of the grain, what were they doing in violation of the Sabbath?
• What does it tell you about the Pharisees own Sabbath keeping that they were in the fields with them?
• When they call Jesus on it, Jesus doesn't claim they didn't break the Sabbath.  Instead He refers to David breaking another rule.  What do you think is the underlying connection between His disciples breaking the Sabbath and David taking the holy temple bread?
• Jesus then tells the Pharisees that "The Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath."  What do you think it means to be "Lord of the Sabbath"?  Why do you think Jesus would use that term?
• Greek is more grammatically fluid than English.  The essential construction in Greek would read "Lord is of the Sabbath the Son of Man."  The only grammatical element that is not a "subject" element is "of the Sabbath".  Essentially "Lord" = "Son of Man" and these are equated with respect to the Sabbath.  Considering the audience of this statement are Pharisees, what do you think they thought of Jesus' claim?
• We're not told of the Pharisees response to Jesus' claim to be Lord, not in any of the Gospels.  Why do you think that would be left out after such a dramatic claim on the part of Jesus?
• In verse 6, the word normally translated as "withered" can be found here.  Consider all the other possible and common translations of this word.  What do you think was wrong with the man's hand?
• The religious teachers watched Jesus closely because they wanted to know if He would heal the man.  But Jesus had already cast out demons in the Synagogue (see Luke 4:31-40).  So why do you think they are only now trying to find reason to accuse Him?
• Jesus knew, from before, that they were thinking these things.  So what do you think is His point in bringing the man in the middle of them and asking His question?  What do you think Jesus is getting at?
• Jesus uses the same term, "lawful" in His question to them that they used with Him in the fields. Look that word up.  Notice that it's not based on the word for "law" but from being, like Jesus' claim to authority.  So, it's not a law, but people's interpretation of that law at the core of this issue.  How does that change this issue for you?
• Jesus commands the man to stretch out his hand.  What does that tell you about how the man holds his hand?  In that case how do you think everyone knew his hand was withered?  What then does that tell you about the scene; the people, the man, Jesus' presence there, and so on?
• The Pharisees don't accuse Jesus right there, even though He does what they hoped He would so they could accuse Him.  Why do you think they were thwarted at that point?
• Considering the things you've read about the Sabbath, especially in that culture then, why do you think this bothered the Pharisees so much?  What's their problem?

 Those are plenty of questions to carry us through an hour or so.  Now, what were your AHA moments?

AWAKENING:  What in this passage woke you up?  Why?  What is the Holy Spirit telling you with the "alarm"?

HONESTY: If you are honest with and about yourself, what's the problem in your life and your life with God that is at issue here?  Perhaps you have discovered you focus on minor issues in others to the detriment of your love and compassion for them?  Where is your struggle in this issue?

ACTION:  What do you need to do different in light of the alarm and honest assessment?  What do you need to start doing or stop doing?

Plenty of things to discuss this Thursday.  See you all then!