It will be helpful to read the context of this dinner party. It forms one event in Luke, but could possibly have been a composite of several dinners with any number of hosts. Luke has this as one event, which is also a possibility. Either way, Jesus is not all that comfortable a guest to have in the house of this particular host. He eventually insults the host and the other guests, thoroughly.
Read through the passage (this part, and the rest through 24 for context) several times. Try and get a sense of the setting. Journey, Pharisees coming to Jesus to warn Him about Herod, and then a chief of theirs invites Him to dinner. How nice. Everyone seems to be getting along. Make notes from the perspective of yourself standing among the crowd witnessing this. Including looking in on the dinner party as they recline with some diseased person standing there with them (how does that look in your mind?). Make notes on what you see, what you hear, who is doing what, and why.
After you gone through your own observation journey, perhaps read it through in different translations, then maybe read a commentary or two. See if that helps to define the scene better for you. Adjust your notes and questions accordingly.
Then go back through with the questions below:
- Luke is clear to point out the immediacy of the next event. Why do you think Luke would tie the Pharisees warning so closely with the previous statements?
- They warn that Herod wants to kill Jesus. How likely, based on the crucifixion account later, do you think it is that they are right?
- Jesus responds that He must go to Jerusalem, because no prophet can die outside of the city. While that's not strictly true, what do you think Jesus is getting at?
- Jesus has to cast out demons and perform cures on His way, but look at the timing. To what do you think Jesus may be referring in His "third day" reference?
- Jesus then prophesies over Jerusalem in the form of a lament. How do you feel about Jesus' words? What emotions do they evoke for you?
- Jesus has wanted to gather the city like chicks under the wings of a mother hen. As people hear this, what do you think they think about His words? What do you think this sounds like? See if you can find a reference to this imagery in the Hebrew Scriptures (Hen gathering her chicks).
- What do you think Jesus' last comment refers to, His Triumphal Entry or His eventual appearing later?
- Jesus then enters the house of one of the leaders of the Pharisees. How possible do you think it is that the preceding account was some sort of test? What do you think the connection is?
- The "Guests" are watching Jesus very closely with a diseased person standing there. He's obviously a plant (a human planted intentionally at the scene, not a shrub). Jesus has already healed on the Sabbath several times already in Luke, so why would they be watching for what shouldn't really surprise them? Have they not heard Jesus defend healing on the Sabbath before? Don't these guys talk to each other?
- The man has a disease referred to in the KJV as "dropsy" and many other translations have picked this term as well. Other modern versions call it "swelling". Look up the word here in the Blue Letter Bible site. What do you think it means, and what problems do you see in figuring that out?
- Jesus asks the guests (lawyers and Pharisees) about the legality before He heals. Why do you think He would do that?
- They remains silent when asked about the legality. Considering that Pharisees and lawyers don't always agree on things, why do you think they might have remained silent?
- Jesus heals the man and send him away. Then starts the discussion. What does it tell you about Jesus that He heals and sends him away first, then discusses it?
- Jesus then asks, who doesn't pull a son or a cow (really? cow?) out of a well on the Sabbath. Again no one says a thing. What is interesting to you about His question? Consider His previous questions (13:15-16 for example), what is different here?
- They could not give an answer. The NIV says they had nothing to say, but other translations state they were not able, and the Greek reads that way. What do you think it means that they could not answer, why not?
No comments:
Post a Comment