Bad Leaders Gone Worse

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting August 10 to study further into Judges 9.  Let the weirdness begin!  The people of this chapter are amazingly bizarre and stupid.  There's really very little sense to what they do or why, at least on a strategic level.

Read through the rest of the chapter.  We left off at verse 21, so 22 through 57 is what remains.  We may not get through it all, but you should be familiar with it anyway.  At this point, the writer/editor of Judges slows back down, and goes into agonizing detail, and possible repetition.  Read the verses in several different versions.  There will be some plot elements repeated but with some possibly glaring inconsistencies.

Once you have gone through the passage on your own, read through some commentaries.  They will most likely ignore the inconsistent repetition, but not always.  Be sure to revise your notes and questions before going back through with the questions below.

• Verse 22 sounds a little like the "King Formula" found in Samuel and Kings, but is missing some things.  For an example look at 2 Kings 8:26, and see what's missing in Judges 9:22.  Why do you think the writer/editor would leave out those elements?
• God sends an "evil spirit".  We sort of dealt with this in Samuel with Saul, but there are other places where this seems to happen as well.  Why do you think God would operate using "evil spirits"?
• The "baals" of Shechem deal treacherously with Abimelech, by setting bandits in the hills to rob people passing by.  And it was told to Abimelech.  Why do you think it makes good sense to leaders of a city to encourage bandits around your city?
• Now another character, Gaal, shows up.  He has a lot in common with Abimelech in character.  They have a grape-harvest festival in the temple, and Gaal tells them to "Serve the men of Hamor, father of Shechem!"  But where is Gaal from?  How did he get to Shechem?
• Verse 28 is the first time we hear of Zebul.  It turns out he runs Shechem for Abimelech, or is at least supportive of Abimelech.  So, why do you think he's active on behalf of Abimelech now, but lets the "baals" of Shechem set ambushes in the hills before?  Doesn't he run the show there?
• Zebul sends messengers to Abimelech "deceitfully" or "secretly" or whatever.  If you have access to one, read verse 31 in the NLT or New Revised Standard Version.  If not, look at footnotes in any version except NIV.  You will need a commentary for this one.  If Zebul is being secretive, why do you think he would feel the need?
• Zebul gives Abimelech instruction about how to ambush the people of the city.  Why do you think Abimelech would need that?
• In verse 34, the people with Abimelech are in four companies.  In verse 41, they're in Arumah, and in verse 43, they come back and divide into 3 companies.  This is a confusing description of battle.  What do you think is happening, how do you work it out in your mind?
• One of the problems with the battle description in verses 31 through 49 is the leaving and returning. Why would Abimelech care if the people went out of the city about their business?
• How do you think the people going out into the fields in verse 42 is different from what was supposed to happen back up at verse 34 and following?
• How is it that Shechem can be razed and sowed with salt, but the "Tower of Shechem" and the stronghold of the temple of Baal Berith are missed?  The baals of Shechem aren't even in the city?  What do you think is going on here?
• The tactic used by Abimelech is to set the stronghold on fire, and it works.  All the people in the stronghold of the Temple of Baal Berith die in it.  Shechem is thoroughly destroyed, and by fire.  Considering the curse of Jotham, why do you think this is an important detail?
• Abimelech turns his attention to Thebez.  Why do you think he considered Thebez at all?
• This fight goes well, except for the stronghold.  Notice this stronghold is inside the city.  Abimelech tries the same tactic with this stronghold that he used on the temple in Shechem.  How do you think a woman was able to get a "millstone" to the roof (and why would she), and then throw it over the side, and actually hit Abimelech? 
• Abimelech is actually struck in the head, his skull crushed, and he still calls for his "bearer of stuff" to kill him.  What does that tell you about his head wound?
• If Abimelech's death reminds you of anyone else's, whose death does it remind you of?
• Notice the "ending formula" for kings is missing here as well.  Abimelech is not buried in the tomb of his father, as Gideon was.  And no son of Abimelech reigned in his place.  What do you think this missing piece (no succession linkage) might have meant to the initial audience of Judges in the time of the kings of Judah?
• The writer/editor of Judges concludes with the dissolution of the army after Abimelech's death, and with the tying together of Jotham's curse and the results of Shechem and Abimelech.  What do you think is the writer/editor's point for his 600 BC audience?

Consider the life and choices of Abimelech, but also of the leaders of Shechem.  Where have you made some wrong choices or followed some flawed leaders?  And, how can we keep this sort of stuff from happening to us?

You Want Me to Do What? Part 1

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting December 17 to study Luke 6:20-49 (or as far as we can get).  This is Luke's "Sermon on the Plain".  Like the "Sermon on the Mount" in Matthew 5 through 7, it can be very difficult to receive.  It teaches a completely different perspective on living than human cultures have developed.  Other religious views (like Buddhism) have approximated this sort of view without actually going this far with it.

As you read this passage through, I want you to really fight the urge not to take these teachings at face value.  Think, "This is what Jesus wants me to do, and how He wants me to think." I really, truly, want you to take it seriously.  With that perspective, take notes, jot down questions, go through it a few times.  You may get angry, in fact there could be a whole range of emotions that you discover with this passage.

Once you've been through it yourself, go back through it with a commentary or two.  You will, no doubt, find some rationalization in commentaries.  Where you do, see if you can work past their rationalizations.  Try and maintain a sense of plain meaning with this text.  Only after you have been through the passage yourself, and then through with some commentary go through again with the questions below.

• The "Beatitudes" start with the actual poor instead of the "poor in spirit" as in Matthew.  Why do you think the social/economic category of "poor" would be so important for Luke?
• The next is aimed at the hungry, how might this be different from "poor"?
•  The next is aimed at those mourning, but what they mourn is not mentioned.  Why do you think Luke would use this as a category without narrowing it down based on what is being mourned?  Notice the range of explanation in commentaries.  That usually means that no one really knows.
• The fourth is about how others outside the fellowship of faith treat you.  This is very similar to the final Beatitude in Matthew 5.  How much of this do you think the disciples had to deal with during Jesus' ministry?
• Go back through the four "Beatitudes".  Why are the poor "Blessed" or happy?  Why are the hungry blessed?  Why are the mourning blessed?  What value is there in being mistreated for our faith?  In each case, what is Luke pointing toward?  Why do you think we don't we hear more of this today?
• Go through the "Woes" the same way as the "Blesseds".  Why the rich as a category, why the "well-fed", why the "laughing"?  Ask the same questions about them we did of the blesseds above.
• The sets of four "Happy" and "Woe to" statements are aimed at social/economic categories of people.  What does this tell you about how God views these categories?
• Jesus says to "Love your enemies" and moves on to explain how: do good to those hating you, bless the ones cursing you, pray for the one abusing you, turn the other cheek, give more than asked, do not resist a demand.  How does all this feel to you?  What is your emotional response?  Why do you think that you respond/feel that way?
• Jesus' underlying reason for His charge to love your enemies is to treat others how we want to be treated (v.31).  What does this tell you about how Jesus views your "enemies"?  How do you feel about that?
• Jesus then proceeds to explain how His followers are to be different from "sinners".  If we do merely what they do, there should be no expectation of a benefit from God.  How do you feel about that?  Why do you think you feel that way?
• Look up "kind" from verse 35 here. Really consider the fist (I.) definition listed.  Read that statement of Jesus replacing "kind" with "useful".  Now read Jesus' final explanation of how we are like God when we behave and think this way.  How do you feel about that, and why?
• In the Hebrew Scriptures, there's no exact quote from verse 36.  But look at this phrase repeated in Leviticus over and over:  Leviticus 11:44, 45; 19:2; 20:7,26; 21:8.  How do you think these two phrases might be related, or could they be?
• The next section, especially verse 37 is often quoted, but not necessarily understood.  Look up 1 Corinthians 4:3-5 and 1 Corinthians 5:3, 9-13.  Based on Paul's understanding of 'judging others', what do you think Jesus means here?
• Consider the context with verse 37.  The next set of statements has to do with forgiveness and giving.  Why do you think Jesus would connect that with judgement? How does this connection help you better understand judging others?
• Jesus moves through four reciprocating attitudes toward others.  In each case do you view the reciprocation coming from God or other people?  Why did you choose whichever one you chose?
• Jesus then threads blind leading blind, disciples and teachers, and beams versus splinters in the eye.  We have probably heard a lot of these taken on their own, but what connection do you see between blind leading blind and disciples being above teachers?  How about disciples being above teachers and helping someone with a splinter when you have a beam in your own eye?  What's the connection there?
• Why do you think Jesus is telling them these parables?  Jesus is a power radiating healing machine as He tells them this.  Would they really think that they're smarter than Him?  Who is this for, and why is Jesus telling them?
• Fruit shows the kind of tree...how do you see this related to the blind leading blind, disciples and teachers, and board-eyed splinter helpers?
• From the treasury of the heart the mouth speaks.  This is related to fruit, but also to the previous parables.  Again, what do you see as the connection?
• Jesus wraps up with obedience and what it looks like for disobedience.  How do you see this connected to the previous "fruit/words" point, and the three parables?
• If Jesus is so adamant about obedience at the end, then how should we approach the treatment of the poor versus rich from the beginning?  What about the treatment of enemies?

I can't imagine there being no AHA moments from this.  I don't think I even need to list out how to process it as such.  You know what to do...

Judgement Inside Not Outside

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Study Group meeting July 17 to study 1 Corinthians 5.  This is a very interesting chapter.  Along with the following one (they are somewhat related) Paul's call to not judge seems to reverse itself.  The specific instance is also interesting; not so much the sin as the response of the church.

Read through the chapter several times (it's really short).  Look for peculiar statements, questions, and perspectives.  Ask questions of the text like why, what did that really mean, and what did the people of Corinth think that meant?  Things like that will get you thinking about the text.  You/we may not find answers to those questions, but they get us more engaged with what our Master has inspired.  Jot down your questions and observations and bring them to the meeting.

After compiling your own set of questions and observations, go back through the chapter again with the questions below:

• Look up the word used in verse 1 for the sin committed here.  Listen to the pronunciation.  What English word does this Greek word sound like?  Look up the word, 'pornography' (there isn't any on this site).  What is the origin of this English word?  So what does this 'sin' include?  What sort of sexual behavior would it not include?
• Why do you think this particular sin (in this case in Corinth) is considered bad, even among Gentiles?
•  Read Leviticus 18.  This is a long list, but consider that even relations between parents remarried are included.  Also consider the reason given for such a list.  Why do you think God was both thorough and repeatedly supporting His reason citing the people of both Egypt and Canaan?
• Why do you think the church should have mourned over this sin rather than been proud? 
• Paul has already judged this man as spiritually part of the assembly in Corinth.  Why can he do this when he doesn't even 'judge' himself (see 4:3)?  Why leave judgement for the coming of Jesus in chapter 4, but exercise it here in chapter 5? (read ahead to chapter 6 for even more questions)
• Look at 1 Timothy 1:21-20.  What do you think Paul means there and here when he says 'deliver such a one over to Satan'?  How do you think that happens?
• What do you think it means 'destruction of his flesh so that his spirit may be saved'? (good place to use a 'study Bible' or commentary)
• According to verses 6 through 8, what is the effect of this sin on the church in Corinth?  I think it's clear from this passage the church celebrates the Passover.  What do you think is the significance here to Paul's reference to Jesus as our Passover having been sacrificed?  What do you think that means to them?
• The word, 'associate with' or 'company with' is made up of three words, 'together', 'again', and 'mix', in that order (see the 'Root Word' in the entry).  It's not an uncommon Greek word, but it's not used much in Scripture (3 times, twice in this chapter).  What sort of image does this bring to your mind?
• Why do you think Paul would not prohibit the people from associating with immoral people in the world?  Why be so harsh with the same people in the church?  How do you think church today approaches this problem?
• Look at the list of sins in verses 10 and 11.  Did you notice the list for those in the church is longer?  How do you see all these sins listed?  Do you see them as the same, requiring the same response?
• Consider verse 12 along with 4:5.  Paul clearly has two different things in mind here since he assumes they judge those within the church.  What do you think is the difference?
• If those outside the church are judged by God, do you think this relates to Paul's statements about judging in chapter 4?
• Paul quotes a phrase used in Deuteronomy over and over, almost thematically.  Look at Deuteronomy 13:5, 17:7,12, 21:21, and 22:21.  In each instance in Deuteronomy, how is the evil removed?  Considering verse 5, how closely do you think these concepts are related? 

I know this chapter is only 13 verses, but I think we have plenty of topic to discuss with it.  If these questions bring up more for you, then be sure to bring those to share as well.