Some Rich Dude and Lazarus

This is the study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting September 15 to study Luke 16:14-31.  The chances are good we won't get through the whole thing, but it might be possible to do all of it.

This is the completion of Jesus' teachings on wealth from this chapter.  It seems to move the issue to the heart or attitude of people, and for some reason include divorce.  It concludes with the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus.  The elements of this part of the chapter are hard to follow and the details can be distracting from seeing a main point (sort of like the last one).

Read through the entire chapter at least once to get a sense the overall context.  As you begin to focus on the statements of Jesus in verses 14 through 18, seek the connecting thread.  Break down the parable based on the preceding statements of Jesus and His audience.  As we noticed last week it's good to read the parable in a few translations.  This one may have as many differences as the previous one, but it's still a great exercise.  The NIV with NASB, NLT with ESV, and NRSV with NKJV are good pairings (any of the first suggestions with any of the second will work as well).  Make notes and questions for yourself as you go.  Then see what commentaries have to say.

After you done your own work, go back through with the questions below:

• Once again, the Pharisees are close enough to hear Jesus speaking to His disciples.  So, how likely is it that at least some Pharisees made up the number of Jesus' disciples (not the 12, but followers)?
• These Pharisees scoff at Jesus.  So, following closely enough to hear Him speak to His disciples, they don't necessarily buy in or completely buy in to His views of righteousness.  Why do you think that might be?  How close do you think we need to be to Jesus' views to be considered disciples?
• The Pharisees "justify" themselves, a term which nearly every translation uses, but what do you think this means?  Look at the Greek word on the Blue Letter Bible here.  If you want more information, follow the link to the root word (G1342).  How does this help you understand what the Pharisees were doing?  How does this help you see this activity in yourself?
• The final statement of verse 15 is interesting in that it sounds very much like a blanket statement about everything lifted up among people being detested by God.  Why do you think Jesus put it that way?  What point do you think He's trying to make?
• Jesus uses the word "abomination" or "detestable thing" which is actually a technical theological term in Judaism.  Look at the Greek word on Blue Letter Bible here.  Pay special attention to its usage in other places.  How do you think the Pharisees heard Jesus' statement?  What do you think they thought when He said that?
• In verse 16, we have a really strange statement by Jesus.  This is one verse that really needs several versions, not just one to get a good sense of.  Here again, the Blue Letter Bible will provide an excellent set of parallels.  Pay special attention to the KJV, NIV, NASB, and ESV translations of it.  What do you think Jesus means about John being a "boundary" of some sort?  What do you think Jesus means by people entering the Kingdom of God by force?  What do you think was preached before John if it wasn't the "Kingdom of God"?
• Verse 17 is a well-known statement from Matthew (17:18) as well.  How do you think this statement relates to the two previous verses?
• Verse 18 has parallels in Matthew (5:31-32, 19:9) and Mark (10:11,12).  How do you think this teaching on divorce relates to wealth, the law, and what God finds detestable?  Why do you think Luke put it here?
• The parable of the "Rich Man & Lazarus" begins with the setting of the two characters in verses 19 through 21.  What are your first impressions?  Why do you think Jesus made them so incredibly opposite?
• The rich guy ends up in hell, and Lazarus in "heaven".  Why?  What clues do you have for why one went one place and the other to the other?
• The description of the "after-life" is pretty spooky, one side can see the other but neither can get to the other.  What do you think of that?
• Hell (Hades) is "torment" in verse 23, or "agony" due to "flame" in verse 24.  What do you think of this description, in agonizing torment by fire yet able to see the other side where they aren't?
• Notice Lazarus never speaks in this parable.  Why do you think might be important to Jesus' point?
• Abraham has several comments on the rich man's situation (verses 25, 26, and 29), they get progressively more depressing (from irreconcilable agony to it being his own fault).  What do you think of this assessment of the description of this afterlife?
• The rich man constantly wants Lazarus to do this or that, come here, go there.  What does this tell you about the rich man's understanding of himself and Lazarus?  How different do you think this is from when they were both alive?
• Obviously Abraham's final statement relates to Jesus' resurrection and people's persistent unbelief.  Why do you think Jesus would include that to people following Him closely?  What does that tell you about people, even those who follow Him closely?

That should be plenty to keep us busy, probably for a few weeks.  Consider where you see God seeing you in these passages.  It's easy to see others, but the Holy Spirit desires to awaken you to growth in your relationship with Him, just as Jesus was prodding the Pharisees in much the same way, to be authentic with their belief and pursuit of a relationship with God.

Trying The Patience of God

This is the study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting December 5 to study Multiply by Francis Chan.  I'm going to assume you've read Part III, Chapter 1 (or Chapter 7 for consistency).  If you haven't, go back and do that first.  In fact, read it a few times to get a sense of some of Chan's details on who, what, why, and so on.

Next, we're going to study a passage he didn't bring up.  I tried to come up with an example of of the dangers of not doing what he suggests.  Since in these cultures, literacy is not common, specific references in Scripture are difficult.  Instead, I keyed off of what reading the Bible should be to us, hearing from God.  Now that I have plenty of examples of in Scripture.

We're going to look at Exodus 3 and 4 (or parts of each anyway).  This is the conversation at the burning bush.  I think Moses pretty well covers most of our excuses, and finally exhausts God's patience.

Read through Exodus 3:1-17, then 4:1-14.  As a footnote, read 4:24-26.  Read these through several times.  You're looking for peculiarities, but also look at the flow of the conversation.  Consider what is going on with Moses, why he's using the excuses he is.  He's got a lot of issues going on here, but one main one.  Jot down notes and questions as you go through.

After going over the passages a few times, go back through with the questions below:

• If a bush on fire is enough entertainment to divert Moses, does you think that indicates he's bored with his current life, or something like this is truly amazing enough to divert a contented man, or something else?
• What do you think made the ground holy?
• At what point do you think Moses recognizes God and connects Him with his heritage?
• God lays out a lot of detail in His initial description of what He's doing with Moses (v.7-10).  This is pretty much repeated throughout His discussion with Moses.  Moses' first issue is his 'suitability' to go to Pharaoh.  He was raised in Pharaoh's household, so what do you think Moses is questioning here?
•  When Moses asks about his 'suitability', God starts out with, "I will be with you" and gives Moses a sign.  How helpful do you think that particular sign would be in motivating Moses?  When would the sign be confirmed?
• Why do you think God's name would be the second problem Moses points out? What do you think is the assumption in Moses' mind if he wants to know God's name? (it might be helpful to consider his background and current family situation)
• God's answer to Moses' question about His name is not the ordinary deific name.  Consider that God's answer in verse 14 is a little different than in 15.  While there is a possible connection, they are not exactly the same (I'll show you at the group meeting).  What sort of effect do you think this name would have on the elders of Israel?  Is it how they would recognize God?  And if not, how does this solve the problem Moses brought up?
• Moses' third complaint is about his validity before the Israelites.  God answers that with three 'signs'.  So, who are these signs for?  Yet, one is one of the plagues against Egypt.  Why do you think the bloody Nile would be a sign to the Israelites?
• Next Moses' complains that he is not eloquent.  Consider God's answer here.  It isn't like the rest.  What do you think Moses is doing, and what do you think God is doing with His answer?  What I mean by that is why would Moses bring up this particular issue, and why would God answer this particular way?  Assume God knows what's going on in Moses' head even if we don't, so His answer is really the clue to what Moses is getting at.
• Moses literally says, "Excuse me Lord, please send in the hand of you will send."  Imagine some person from another country using broken English were to say this to you.  What do you think they might mean by it?
• God's response to Moses' final question or request is to get angry.  Why?  Considering all that has been involved in this discussion, why do you think now God is angry with Moses?  Also, if you don't think God is all that angry, remember the 'footnote' verses (v. 24-26) I mentioned earlier.
• Now, if God speaks to us primarily through Scripture what do we risk by not being diligent in seeking familiarity with these words?  It's one thing to not do what God has asked us to do well, but to not do it at all, how risky is that for us?
• Go back through the list of complaints of Moses.  How many of these, in some form and/or at some time, have you used to excuse yourself from studying Scripture?

That should keep us busy for an hour.  Remember that this really reinforces the chapter in Multiply, so please read that first.  The main point I'm trying to make will make much more sense if you do.