There Arose Such a Clatter

 This is the study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting December 9, to study Acts 2. And it's late...sorry about that.

Read through the chapter a few times and note details of action. There is a lot of speech in this chapter but try to focus on the action. Make notes of who's doing what. That should help you put yourself into the scene in different places. Jot down what you think about what's happening. And write down questions about the text. What Luke wrote, why that particular way, and so on. You will have more questions if you read the chapter in more translations.

Once you have your notes, go back through with a commentary or study Bible and make any modifications to your own notes and questions. You may have more questions after looking at a commentary. Bring these to the study group.

After you go through a commentary, go back through with the questions below:

• The disciples were filled with the Holy Spirit who then gives them the ability to speak clearly in other languages. Why do you think it was important for the Holy Spirit to enable them to speak clearly? And yet, everyone seems to know they are Galileans. If it wasn't their accent, then how do you think the people knew?
• Some think they're drunk. If all could hear clearly spoken things of God in their own language, why do you think that would suggest drunkenness? When does drunkenness increase intelligibility?
• Peter draws from the end of Joel, who prophesies about the "Great Day of the Lord". How do you think Jesus' life and ascension is the "Great Day of the Lord"? How did His life, death, resurrection, and ascension match the description Peter quotes?
• So, of those from all over (see verses 9 to 11) join the 120, adding 3,000 to their number, how many stayed in Jerusalem? Did some go back to those areas? What can you find out about the Jewish pilgrimage process in the first century AD?
• If the group of disciples grew from 120 to 3,000, what sort of problems do you think that would cause? What do you think of their solution in verses 44 and 45?

I'll stop there. I have lots more questions. The chapter makes my head spin. Bring your clarity and prayer requests.

See you Thursday!

Denials and Trials

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting March 2 to study Luke 22:54-71.  This is both Peter's denial and Jesus' "trial" such as it is in Luke.  The parallel passages are Matthew 26:57-75, Mark 14:53-72, and John 18:13-27.  It will be helpful to read these others as there are details that are actually difficult to reconcile.

Read through the passage in Luke, and the parallels looking for the scenes in as much detail as you can imagine.  There are two scenes, one in the courtyard, and one in a big room in the house.  Put yourself right in the crowd in the courtyard.  What noises and voices do you hear?  What do you see?  What do you smell?  What are the people talking about?  Once you have the scene set in your mind, now read the text.

Now put yourself in the house with the religious leaders and guards.  What noises and voices do you hear there?  What do you see, what do you smell?  What are the people on the fringes of the crowd discussing?  Once you have the scene set in your mind, now read the text.

Jot down your observations, questions you have about what's in Luke or the parallel passages.  Think through the differences and see if any sort of reconciliation makes sense in your mind.  Re-imagine the scene again with the insight you've gained and see if anything changes.  Remember to ask why who says what.

Armed with those notes and questions, now go to commentaries.  The Matthew Henry Commentary on the Blue Letter Bible will be helpful here because it's so detailed.  Keep in mind that commentators have trouble with synchronizing the various Gospel accounts.  So, different commentators will take different approaches.  Of the variety of views you find, try and pick one, or combination of some, that make the most sense to you.  You won't be in danger of being wrong if you disagree with any of them (or me, or each other).

After you've done this work, go back through with the questions below:

• Peter follows the soldiers and officials who arrested Jesus at a distance, but then joins them at the courtyard fire.  Why do you think Peter would approach so close?  Why do you think none of the other disciples did?
• The accounts in the various Gospels disagree on almost every point surrounding Peter's denial except that there were three, and in the courtyard of the high priest.  Why do you think there was such variance in the accounts?
• The first accusation always seems to be a servant girl, either the one who let Peter in or one present.  Why do you think that might be an important point?
• The second accusation takes various forms from different people, and Peter's response is also different in each account.  How significant do you think these differences are in light of the point of the overall "denial scene"?
• The third denial in each Gospel seems to stem from Peter being from Galilee (his speech/accent gives him away).  While the exact details vary, the element of his being from the same region as Jesus seems the same.  Why do you think that might be significant, or significant enough to show up in the same order in each Gospel?
• In Luke, as Peter makes his third denial, Jesus looks straight at him.  This detail occurs only in Luke.  It may be hard to imagine how they could see each other, but why do you think this detail is important for Luke to include?
• Peter weeps over his failure in Matthew, Mark, and Luke; but John has nothing.  What do you think is going on in Peter's mind and heart?
• The trial of Jesus in Luke is very short, but when does the event take place in Luke?
• The beating of Jesus by the guards in Luke comes before He stands before the council, in the others, after they accuse Him.  How might this help you reconcile the timing of the three accounts of Matthew and Mark with Luke?
• As the guards blind and then beat Jesus, they ask Him to prophesy who hit Him.  This is supremely ironic for the readers/hearers of the first century because of how Luke arranges his account.  What irony do you see here?
• The council of elders, chief priests and scribes assemble and Jesus is brought to them.  They ask Him if He is the "Messiah".  What do you think they mean by that term?
• Jesus' answer to the council is really weird in Luke.  What do you think Jesus means by "...if I ask you a question you will not answer..."?  Read Luke 20:1-8 and see if that helps any (it may not - honestly nobody really knows)
• Look at how Jesus describes where He will be seated the next time they see Him.  In Matthew, Mark, and Luke, Jesus will be "...seated at the right hand of power...".  Luke adds, "of God", which is obvious, but look at the range of options for this word in the Strong's entry on the Blue Letter Bible.  This is supposed to be a quote from Psalm 110:1, but only the reference to "sitting to the right" is from there.  So, why do you think there is this common reference to "power" in each Gospel (except John)?  What do you think is the point of "power" to the early followers of Jesus?
• In Luke, Jesus is asked if He is the "Son of God".  How do you think the religious leaders made the leap from "seated at the right of 'power'" to Jesus being the "Son of God"?  Keep in mind that's not a normal understanding of the "Messiah" in Judaism.
• In each of the responses recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, Jesus literally says, "You say that I am."  In a sense Jesus dodges the question, but still affirms the title.  Why do you think this might be important enough for each Gospel writer to record it exactly the same?
• This assertion, or affirmation, is all the religious leaders need to accuse Jesus.  Why do you think it was enough?  What is Jesus being accused of by the religious leaders?

That's plenty to keep us busy.  Remember to look for places where you learn about your relationship with Jesus.  Keep in mind, saying you'd never think or act that way isn't where you'll learn and grow the most.  Stretch yourself, and see where our Master might be trying to deepen your relationship with Him.

Blessings upon you all until we meet again!

Capturing God

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting February 23 to study Luke 22:39 through 53.  This is a smaller chunk, but I wanted to take the trial and denial in one sitting.  The parallels to this are in Matthew 26:36-56 and Mark 14:32-52.  But also read John 18:1-12.

If you have time to read this in various translations, you will some variety in word choice, but the essential meaning remains in each.  The passage breaks nicely into two parts, Jesus' prayer and arrest.  John only has the arrest, unless you count John 17 as the prayer in the Garden.  Most readers don't, because it's simply too different. 

Each Gospel writer emphasizes something different.  Focus on Luke's emphasis, but to do that, you'll need to at least see how he's different from the others.  If you have a "Harmony of the Gospels" you will find this task a lot easier.  The Blue Letter Bible site (not the app) has one if you don't.

Make sure to take good notes and questions as you go through the Gospel accounts.  After you have your own notes and questions, refer to commentaries you have available.  Revise your notes and questions as necessary.  After your own work go back through with the questions below:

• Gethsemane is supposed to be on the Mount of Olives.  But Luke isn't that precise.  The others are, so we know Jesus was in the Garden of Gethsemane.  Why do you think Luke would not include such a detail?
• In Luke 21:37, Luke includes the detail that Jesus "camped" out on the Mount of Olives rather than stay in some house in the city.  Since there were so many pilgrims in Jerusalem, this isn't odd.  But what does that also tell you of the "privacy level" of the Mount of Olives at this time?
• In the other Gospels, Peter, James, and John are singled out to follow Jesus deeper into the garden.  Why do you think Luke would leave out such a detail?
• In Luke Jesus instructs all the disciples to pray and in Matthew and Mark only tells the three to "keep watch".  Why do you think Luke is more inclusive and focus' on prayer here?
• In Matthew and Mark both, Jesus prays three times.  Luke has only once, but it's intense.  See if your favorite translation footnotes verse 43 and 44.  If they don't it's not important, but it's possible these verses were added later.  Why do you think that would be unlikely?
• Luke is the only Gospel writer to mention why the disciples were so tired.  What do you think Luke means by "...from sorrow"?  What do you think they are grieving?
• Luke has the crowd show up immediately while Jesus is telling them to pray to avoid temptation (repeating His earlier command).  What is interesting to you about Luke's crowd (v.47) as opposed to the other Gospels (including John)?
• Matthew and Mark explain the kiss of Judas, Luke says he tried to kiss but Jesus didn't let him, and John doesn't even mention any sort of attempt by Judas.  What do you think happened?
• Then there was sword play.  The servant has his ear cut off.  In Matthew and Mark someone does it.  In Luke someone does it but Jesus heals it.  And in John Peter does it to Malchus.  What do you do with the differences?
• In Matthew, Jesus tells them that to live by the sword one dies by the sword, and that He has legions of angels to fight if it were warranted.  In Mark, Jesus just moves on to address the "angry mob".  In Luke, Jesus simply says to stop it (then heals the man).  In John, Jesus addresses Peter telling him not to prevent this from happening (allusion to the Garden prayers in the other Gospels?).  So what do you think happened?
• Now, in verse 52, Luke has the make up of the crowd.  Matthew has a crowd from the chief priest and elders with swords and clubs.  Mark has a crowd with swords and clubs.  Luke finally mentions the make up but the chief priests and and officers of the temple are actually there.  And John continues to refer to the Roman soldiers, a detail missing from all the others.  Why do you think such details might have been difficult to sort out from this event?
• What Jesus says to the crowd is similar in Matthew, Mark, and Luke; but very different in John.  Luke has Jesus referring to "this hour and the power of darkness" which is missing from the others, and John has Jesus going out to them, and them literally falling down at His approach.  Again, why do you think these details might be difficult to sort out?
• Read verse 53 of Luke in a couple of translations.  At least use a King James and an NIV.  It's even better to have a New American Standard or English Standard Version with those.  Literally, the verse reads: "...but this is of you the hour and the power of darkness."  The pronoun "this" matches exactly with the objects "hour" and "power".  What do you think Jesus means by the "power of darkness" being of them?

That should keep us busy for the time we have.  Remember to consider this passage as it applies to you?  For instance, when have you ever tried to solve a problem God doesn't have (with a sword, screw driver, or sack of groceries)?  There are other points of application you can find.  Make sure those make it into your notes.

Of Cups, of Memories, and of Future Glory

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting February 9 to study as far as we get between Luke 22:14 through 38.  Chances are good that we won't get through the bread and cups (yes, cups).

Read this passage through several times.  The parallels in Matthew 26 and Mark 14 are also helpful.  John covers the same time frame in chapters 13 through 16.  It's possible the prayer of John 17 was also said in the upper room.  Reading at least John 13 is probably very helpful as well, since it explains some things missing in Matthew, Mark, and Luke.

Be sure as you read to make notes, especially questions.  If you have access to a book (large or small) about how the Passover goes, it will be helpful here.  A Bible handbook (big, thorough one) might have a succinct treatment of the Passover as well. Luke's sequence is not quite the same as the others, so pay attention to the differences.

The remainder through verse 38 of Luke are made up of small discourses.  The questions below will take them individually.  You may find it useful to consider them that way, but commentaries will differ in how they do that, if they even do.

After gaining your own notes and commentary examination, then go back through with the questions below:

• Luke uses the term "apostles" here instead of disciples.  Prior to this he uses "the Twelve" or disciples.  It's possible that he has a technical reason for this or is making some other point.  What reason do you think Luke has for referring to the twelve disciples of Jesus as "apostles" here?
• Luke begins Jesus' discourse with His looking forward to when they celebrate it again in the "final kingdom" of God.  Matthew and Mark both have it at the end.  Why do you think Luke would put that at the beginning?
• Luke has Jesus passing around a cup, having given thanks, before the bread.  There's some question about when, during a traditional Passover meal, this might happen, and exactly which of 4 cups of wine Jesus shares first (thanksgiving).  In any case, there are two cups before the "bread" and two after.  So why do you think Luke makes a point of including this first cup?
• There is some debate about whether the practice of the Passover in the first century used a 3-pocket bag for the unleavened bread.  But regardless, bread was broken in the course of the meal.  Jesus' use of this to refer to His physical suffering changes the meaning from what it was in the meal.  To what do you think Jesus refers with the bread, and why do you think it is so important for us to remember?
• Jesus then shares a cup, again of memorial.  This though, signifies something completely different.  The final two cups of wine in a more modern tradition are the cup of Elijah and the final cup.  Again debate exists as to which cup Jesus uses to signify His blood.  The practice in the first century could have been very different from what we have today.  But which one makes more sense to you, the cup of Elijah or the final cup? (you're going to need to do some research to get at the difference on this one)
• Jesus then reveals He is going to be betrayed.  What do you think it means when Jesus He is going where it has been determined but still "woe" on His betrayer?  Why, if it's determined (think, "necessary") is the one betraying Him in such trouble?  (this was brought up last week)
• Only Matthew has Judas asking Jesus if it's him (like everyone else asks, but this time to see whether Jesus really knew or not).  Jesus responds there with an enigmatic statement.  Considering that Jesus washes Judas' feet and Judas is part of the meal, what do you think Jesus is doing for Judas by including him in all of that?  
• As they were looking back, what do you think Jesus' treatment of Judas meant to the Twelve, you know, "upon reflection"? What can you tell from what they remember and relate about Jesus' treatment of Judas in the Gospels?
• The disciples begin to discuss among themselves who might be the one betraying Jesus, which makes sense.  But then their questioning breaks out into an argument about which one is the "greatest".  Imagine you're in the room with them.  What do you hear?  What are they saying, and how do they get from asking about the betrayer to asserting their own greatness?  What do you learn about yourself and human beings from this exercise?
• Only Luke has Jesus comments about greatness right here in the upper room discourse.  Although John 13 has something very similar here related to Jesus' washing of the disciple's feet.  How does John 13 help you with Jesus' statements recorded here in Luke?  
• Only Luke has Jesus next comment about the apostles sitting on thrones judging the 12 tribes of Israel.  But read verses 28 through 30 in several translations (Blue Letter Bible may help here).  Look particularly at how 29 is connected to 30.  So, what do you think?  Is Jesus promising the twelve a kingdom, just as He Himself has been appointed one by the Father?
• In verses 31, Jesus begins speaking to Peter about his denial.  Only Mark do we have this statement about satan requesting to "sift" him.  The way it's worded (and the context supports this), the implication is that God granted satan's request.  Why do you think God would do that?
• Jesus prays for Peter that his faith may not fail.  Considering Jesus' next comment about Peter's "return" what do you think Jesus means by praying for Peter's faith not to fail?
• Jesus seems to know what Peter will face, and yet still gives him a job to do afterwards.  He knows how it will go, but that does not disqualify Peter for service (at least not after he returns).  What does that tell you about Jesus' thoughts on qualifications for ministering?
• In the other Gospels, Peter claims his faithfulness in the Garden (Mount of Olives).  In Luke and John, they haven't left just yet.  How important is this detail to you?
• In Matthew and Mark, the other disciples claim faithfulness as well along with Peter.  This detail is missing from Luke and John.  Is it sort of assumed in the other two, or do you think there's some reason it didn't make it in?
• Read Matthew 26:34, Mark 14:30, Luke 22:34, and John 13:38.  How many times does the rooster crow before Peter denies Jesus?  Write that down.  Now read Mark 14:66 - 72.  Why do you think Mark would have such a precisely numbered detail?  (who was Mark's source again?)
• Only Luke has the detail about the twelve disciples/apostles now being "equipped" and Jesus contrasts that with when they were sent out as 12 and 72 taking no provisions.  Why do you think things are different now?
• Jesus tells them to sell a coat and buy a sword.  What do you think that is about?
• Jesus' explanation about the sword is because it has been foretold that He will be numbered (accounted) among "lawless" ones (outlaw?).  Why do you think that makes a sword necessary?
• The disciples already have two swords (for 12 men?), and Jesus says that's sufficient.  Why, if they are supposed to sell their coat and buy a sword, are 2 swords sufficient for 12 men?

 That's going to take us a while to get through, so get comfy!

Don't forget to look at what these things mean for your own walk with Jesus.  How does the Passover celebration and Jesus' changes reveal something of your relationship with Him, and His love for you?

And Jesus' dealing with Peter and the other disciples, how does that help you better understand your relationship with Jesus? 

What Is The Church? What Are Her Leaders?

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Study Group meeting June 5 to study 1 Corinthians 3.  This chapter continues the discussion Paul has been having with the church in Corinth about their behavior.  In some ways, this concludes the discussion for Paul (or his side), but not entirely.  He returns to themes he started in chapter 1, refers to elements he brought up in chapter 2, and wraps them up under his essential problem with what he hears about the Corinthian believers.

Read through the chapter several times.  It may be helpful in this case to also re-read from chapter 1 through 3 to get sense of how this particular piece holds together (which it does nicely).  That way you can better see what elements he revisits here, and how he uses prior comments and positions.  In this chapter, focus on the 'imagery' Paul uses.  Look for what he considers to be of utmost importance the problems among the Corinthian believers. Jot down questions and observations as you go through the chapter several times.

After going through the chapter a few times making notes and questions, go back through using the questions below:

• If Paul's accusation against the Corinthian believers is that they are 'infants' and 'fleshly', then what problem do you think he's trying to correct?
• What 'clues' does Paul point to with the Corinthians to substantiate his assessment of them?
• Verse 4 pulls back the argument elements from Chapter 1.  So, what do you think that means for our understanding of this and previous chapters?
• Read Mark 4:26-29.  Now read verses 5 through 7 in 1 Corinthians 3.  What do you think might be similarities here?  What might be some differences?
• In Paul's use of the field and workers as imagery how much do you think he 'borrowed' from words of Jesus?  Where would he have 'heard' these words?
• What do you think Paul means by 'reward' in verse 8?  And who gets whatever the reward might be?
• Who is the 'field' and 'building? And who do they belong to?
• Why do you think Paul means by 'foundation'? How is Jesus the 'foundation' of the Corinthian church?
• So, what do you think it means to 'build' on Jesus Christ?  And what do you think it means to build with various materials?
• How will fire 'test' the quality, and what do you think Paul means by 'fire'?  What fire will test the quality?
• Paul again returns to 'reward' in verse 14.  How do you think this is or isn't similar to 'reward' in verse 8?
• In verse 15, 'loss' and 'saved' are both used, but what do you think they are referring to?
• In verses 10 through 15, who is being addressed?  Who is this for?
• Paul again returns to 'wisdom' and 'foolishness' to wrap up his argument.  How do you think he is tying 'wisdom versus foolishness' to 'building'/'planting' and various factions?  What's his point?
• How do you think 'all things' belong to the Corinthian church?  What does that mean for us?

That should keep us busy for a while.  I'm not sure we will be able to answer all these questions, some really may not be answerable.  Be sure to bring your own questions as well.

Feeding Popular Opinion and Worms

This is the study page for Chapter 13 of Acts for the study group session on Thursday, December 6.  We're also feeding the Infiltrate group, so this study may be put off a week.  On either week, this is the study page.

Be sure and read through the chapter a few times.  Be sure and look up Herod so you know something about him (more than the footnote in your study Bible).  The ISBE article on The Blue Letter Bible site should be sufficient.  The first problem will be figuring out which Herod we have in chapter 13.  Here is a link to get you started.

Also look for those things that seem odd or out of place.  Look for details that are interesting or intriguing.  Once you've gone through and made your own set of notes and questions, go through again and use the questions below:

• This seems sudden.  From any research on Herod, why him, why now?
• There is not much said about James' death, not like Stephen, what is that weird?
• How is this king able to get the "apostles", especially the top three so easily?
• What seems odd about Peter's imprisonment?
• What seems very beneficial about the timing?  What does that mean for Peter though?
• How long were people praying for Peter?
• What does the angel do to wake Peter up?  Why is that odd?
• Consider what could have been seen by the guards if someone had noticed Peter leaving.  Why is it impossible that he was seen?
• How did the two soldiers he was chained to not miss him earlier?
• How many facets does this miracle actually have?  How many more are possible?
• So, is this the Angel of the Lord, or just an angel of the Lord?
• What does Peter assume as he's leaving the prison?  Why would he assume that?
• When Peter realizes what happened and where he is, where is he?  Where is the angel?
• What does Peter do first?  Where does he go?  What character is introduced?
• Who answers the door?  Look closer, who answers the door?
• What do the people think about poor Rhoda?  Why?
• What is odd about what they were praying about, who is at the gate, and how they respond?
• What does Peter tell them?  Why James?  What does that tell you about the "authority" of the "Twelve"?
• What does the morning bring at the prison?
• Who is looking for Peter?  What happens to the guards?  Who's the victim here?
• What is being setup between the people of Phoenicia and Tyre and King Herod?
• How do the people (which people?) respond to the king's speech?
• How does God respond to the king's response to the people's response to the king's speech?
• What happens to the church?
• What is the timing of these events?  
• Who returns with Barnabas and Saul?

That is plenty for our discussion.  You probably have a lot of questions not listed here, so please bring them with you.  I look forward to seeing you all Thursday!

Blessings upon you until then!

Who Let You In Here?

This is the study page for the Thursday Night Small Group meeting on November 29.  The Scripture passage is Acts chapter 11.  This passage falls neatly into two sections, verses 1-18 regarding Peter being challenged about the acceptance of Gentiles, and verses 19-30 about the believers in Antioch.

As you read this chapter, catch the last 4 verses of chapter 10 just for context.  Read this chapter through several times (hopefully you already have been).  Look for things that "don't match", and what I mean by that is questions that don't match the setup of the problem, answers that don't match questions, or events and actions that don't match initial intent.  Things like that can indicate some element of the account that Luke assumed was understood without explanation. They can also indicate some sort of cultural idiom, custom, or etiquette.  Look for other pieces that are strange, out of place, or just hit you cross ways.  List them, look into them (you can use the Blue Letter Bible website), and share them with us on Thursday.

After you've done some poking around on your own, or if you haven't found anything as you did so, consider the questions below as you go through the chapter:

• What had the believers in Judea heard about the Gentiles?
• Who addressed Peter in Jerusalem?
• What did they ask?  What does that have to do with what was heard?
• Why would this be important? (we sort of discussed this in chapter 10 with the whole "heavenly sheet" thing)
• How does Peter respond?  What does verse 4 say in various translations?
• Look up the Greek word used to describe how Peter went through his explanation (G2517).  Why do it that way?  What's his intent?
• What two responses does Peter get to his explanation?
• What do Peter's inquisitors conclude from his account?  (hang onto that piece of info for later)
• Why are people spreading throughout the region?
• What might that mean for the timing of these events?
• Look up the three "regions" mentioned in verse 19 on a map (one included below).  What's the relationship between all three?  Which one is different?

 

•  What prompts the proclamation to the Gentiles?  Consider the timing again, why is this interesting?
• What do those in Jerusalem do in response?
• What does Barnabas do once he arrives? (At least four things)
• What doesn't he do that might be expected?
• If these events occurred before the preceding 18 verses, then how does that affect your understanding of the reception Peter received when he arrived in Jerusalem?
• What are the differences between what Peter does and what happens in Antioch?
• What do you suppose will happen once Barnabas and Saul reach Jerusalem?

That should get us going for a nice discussion Thursday!  Be sure to bring the other questions and things you found in your own study.  We need your perspective on this.

I look forward to Thursday's discussion.  Have a blessed week!

And Now for the Next Surprising Group

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday night meeting November 8.  It's not a lot different from the last two study pages because we still haven't started chapter 10 (we've been waiting somewhat).  We did finish chapter 9 and discussed whether Aeneas was faking, and why Tabitha was called Dorkas (and it wasn't an insult!).

This week we get into chapter 10! We certainly are taking this slowly, and hopefully we will still be able to plod ahead even with the holidays coming up.  In any case, I hope you have had plenty of chances to read through the chapter, have lots of questions, and are ready to discover the nuggets our Master has for us in this chapter.  I have re-listed the questions for chapter 10.

• What are the stark contrasts in Cornelius?
• Read this article on Cornelius.  What might motivate him to worship God?
• Where is Cornelius from?
• What does God think of Cornelius?
• After the vision, who does Cornelius tell?
• Why send a servant and a soldier?
• What is Peter doing on the roof?
• What is his distraction while praying?
• Being hungry, what does the vision suggest?
• What is Peter's response to the vision?
• What is God's command? (Read it in several translations!)
• How much does Peter understand about his vision before he goes to Caesarea?
• Peter travels with the men from Cornelius, but who goes with him?
• When he arrives, what does Cornelius do?  Why would he do that?
• What is Peter's response when Cornelius tells him about his own vision?
• What quality of God does Peter discover here?
• What is Peter's assumption as he relates what he knows of Jesus?  Why assume that?
• How long does Peter have to wait during the invitation for people to respond?
• How are Peter's companions described here?
• Why are they "beside themselves"?
• What does Peter suggest (or command) they do?

I look forward to seeing all of you tomorrow night!  Have a great...two days!

Whom God Accepts

This is the study page for the Thursday Night Small Group meeting on November 1.  We will pick up at the end of Acts 9 and continue through 10 (or as far as we get). 

Last week we left off at verse 32 of Acts 9, where the narrative switches from Saul to Peter.  The remainder of 9 sets up Peter for the events of chapter 10, so they go well together.  Read from 9:32 through the end of 10:48 all together a few times.  Jot down thoughts and insights.  Note any peculiarities you find (try looking at a couple of different translations, and note differences).  Once you've taken down some notes yourself, having read the passage a few times, go back over it using the questions below:

Acts 9:32-43:

• What is known about Aeneas?
• What does Peter tell him to do (look it up in as many translations as you can)?
• Why does that seem odd? Why tell him to do that?
• What is the name of the lady in Joppa? (G5000) (G1393)
• What do the widows call her?
• What does Peter call her?
• What is the effect of all these healings?

Acts 10

• What are the stark contrasts in Cornelius?
• Read this article on Cornelius.  What might motivate him to worship God?
• Where is Cornelius from?
• What does God think of Cornelius?
• After the vision, who does Cornelius tell?
• Why send a servant and a soldier?
• What is Peter doing on the roof?
• What is his distraction while praying?
• Being hungry, what does the vision suggest?
• What is Peter's response to the vision?
• What is God's command? (Read it in several translations!)
• How much does Peter understand about his vision before he goes to Caesarea?
• Peter travels with the men from Cornelius, but who goes with him?
• When he arrives, what does Cornelius do?  Why would he do that?
• What is Peter's response when Cornelius tells him about his own vision?
• What quality of God does Peter discover here?
• What is Peter's assumption as he relates what he knows of Jesus?  Why assume that?
• How long does Peter have to wait during the invitation for people to respond?
• How are Peter's companions described here?
• Why are they "beside themselves"?
• What does Peter suggest (or command) they do?

That is probably more than enough for discussion this Thursday.  I look forward to seeing you on Thursday!

Of Philip, Paul, and Peter: Spreading Good News, Changing Lives

This is the study page for the Thursday Night small group meeting on October 25.  We will be picking up with the last part of chapter 8 (the Ethiopian Eunuch), and then moving through Chapter 9 (Paul's conversion and Peter's work on the Palestinian coast).  We may get through the whole of chapter 9, but we may not (if last week was any indicator of how things might go this week).

I have included the questions from last week's study page for Chapter 8:26-40, and then added the ones for chapter 9.  As always, read through the passages on your own a few times, jotting down questions and observations.  Be sure to look for things that stand out about people, places, and timing.  Once you have read through a few times, go back through and consider the questions below:

Chapter 8:26-40

• With such a great "revival" is breaking out among the Samaritans, Philip is sent somewhere else. What sort of hesitation or limits does Philip put his response?
• He's on a desert road, and who does he see?
• Who is "Candace"? Follow the links and read about the Queen and country.
• There is an interesting pun in the text, missed in English. In verse 26, the word for Gaza is this one (G1048), and in verse 27, the word for "treasury" is this one (G1047). It turns out to be an accident of language (Gaza is of Philistine origin, and treasury is of Persian origin), but they could be related in some way.
• How is Philip receiving his "orders"? What does that tell you about the Spirit of God?
• Where is the eunuch headed? So where has he come from? Why wouldn't he be able to get an explanation from where he came from?
• What happens to Philip after the baptism? This is a debated event, think about how it's described in a few different translations.

Chapter 9:1-31

• What clues, if any, are provided that give a reason why Saul is so violent toward the believers?
• How did believers get to Damascus?  Why would Saul think that would be a good place to find them?
• What sort of authority would letters from the high priest give Saul? Under what limitations?
• What does Saul's method (high priest letters of authority to the Synagogues) tell you about the believers in Damascus?
• Why the "drama" with Saul's conversion?  Who is Saul persecuting?  How is that?
• What seems odd about Saul's question in verse 5?
• What part(s) do Saul's companion's share in this experience?  What happens to them?
• Why does Ananias' response to God sound familiar?  Who does he sound like?
• What about his assignment bothers Ananias?  How does he respond to the assignment?
• What explanation does God give to him about Saul?
• What is interesting about what Ananias says to Saul, by way of introduction/explanation?
• How long does Saul wait before preaching? (but what about Galatians 1:16-24?)
• Where is he doing all this preaching?
• What sort of preaching is he doing?
• What sort of response does he get from the people?
• Who lowers him over the wall?  What does that tell you about Saul?
• Where does he go?  What sort of response does he get there?
• Who comes to his rescue and what does he do?
• Who does Saul argue with in Jerusalem?  Why do these guys sound familiar? 
• Why does their response sound so familiar?  What trend do you see here?
• What do the believers do to rescue Saul?
• Why would Saul's conversion bring such peace on the region for the believers?

Acts 9:32-43

• What is known about Aeneas?
• What does Peter tell him to do (look it up in as many translations as you can)?
• Why does that seem odd?  Why tell him to do that?
• What is the name of the lady in Joppa? (G5000) (G1393)
• What is she known for?
• What do the widows call her?
• What does Peter call her?
• What is the effect of all these healings?

Be sure to read the passages several times.  Look up words that seem odd or interesting on the Blue Letter Bible site. Bring your questions and observations to the group.

See you Thursday!  Blessings upon you until then!

Responding to Adversaries

This is the blog entry for our small group meeting on Thursday, September 20.  The passage is Acts 4, and it completes the story begun in Chapter 3.  It might be a good idea to re-read that chapter and then spend some time in this one.

Be sure to read through it all at once, in one sitting.  Then, the second and subsequent times you read through, jot down observations, points of interest, and anything questions that the text does not readily answer.  Once you have a good feel for the chapter, read it again and consider the questions below:

• Who are these people who disrupt Peter's sermon?
• Why were they disrupting and imprisoning the three (Peter, John, and the formerly lame man)?
• How many people were added to the existing group of believers?
• The big-wigs meet and put the three amigos in the center.  What do they want to know?  How does their question seem odd after verse 2?
• What is it about Peter that enables him to come up with his answer?
• How does Peter's answer differ from the concerns that motivated his arrest?
• What's the prime similarity between this speech and the previous two?
• Peter uses another passage of Scripture, Psalm 118.  The reference is to verse 22.  What do you notice about this verse (perhaps with the one on either side with it) that seems an odd addition to this Psalm?  What about it seems to fit very well?
• What about Peter's speech can be taken as blasphemy by the assembly?
• What is the dilemma the assembled leaders face?
• What is their answer?  Why that answer considering their conundrum?
• What is Peter's response to their response? What does this response do to the leader's conundrum?
• Why can't Peter and John be charged with blasphemy?
• The freed captives go back to the other believers and report.  What is the response of that assembly?
• How does the assembly of believers see their problem?
• What do the people pray for?
• What is the immediate answer?
• The people are "filled" again with the Holy Spirit, again the effect is speech, but what is different here?
• How is verse 32 similar to chapter 2:44?  What other similar behaviors do you observe here to those in chapter 2?
• What isn't mentioned here but was a big part of the description of the church in chapter 2?

Keep in mind that the ending of this chapter sets us up for chapter 5.  I look forward to seeing you all on Thursday!  Blessings upon you until then (Chicken and Dumplings for Dinner!).

More Than Silver And Gold

This is the blog page for the small group meeting on Thursday, September 13.  The topic will be Acts 3, which is only half of the story.  It is completed in Chapter 4, and I encourage you to read that chapter as well.  It will be difficult not to move on to that chapter, but there are elements of both that merit two weeks of study.

I suggest that both chapters be read together just to get a sense of the story.  Then go back over 3 more slowly, looking for anything that sticks out about events, the main characters, the setting, and dialogue (or monologue, as it turns out).  As you read the second time, jot down questions or observations.  Be sure to look up words that jump out at you as either important or peculiar in some way.

As you read the third time consider the questions below:

• Considering the previous chapter's ending, how unusual is it for Peter and John to be going to the temple?
• How often must they have seen this guy before? Why now would it be a different response to him?
• Peter speaks, but how involved does John seem to be?
• How old is the lame beggar?
• Exactly at what point did the man's legs and feet become "strong"?  Why is that significant? (or is it?)
• Consider the sight of the three entering the temple.  How possible is it for the people inside and out to miss the entrance?
• The people's response is again "wonder" and "amazement" but different words are used here. The first is "wonder" (G2285) and the second is "amazement" (G1611).  Which one seems more descriptive and why?
• In Peter's response, he uses a word from the last chapter, "Amazed" (G2296), so how is this crowd's reaction similar to the crowd on the Day of Pentecost?
• Peter again lays the death of Jesus at the feet of the people (v. 13-16), but after that how does he "soften" his approach in ways he didn't in the previous chapter?
• What different Biblical elements does he use here not used in his previous "sermon"?
• Peter finally quotes some Scripture, Deuteronomy 18.  How did he apply this to Jesus?
• How does Deut. 18 describe the penalty for not listening to the Prophet? Does it really say the person not listening will be "destroyed" or "cut off"?
• Peter then refers to the blessing of Abraham.  How does this apply to Jesus?
• Peter acknowledges that the blessing is to every "family", but who "first"?  Why them?

You will probably have more questions, so bring them on!  If you want to post them as comments to this entry first, we can all be thinking about them before Thursday.

I am looking forward to meeting again Thursday.  Our last meeting was amazing.  Blessings upon you all!

Moving fron Son-Powered to Wind-Powered Lives

This is the study page for this Thursday, August 23 (possibly).  We will be looking over Acts 2, which may take us more than a week.

As you read Acts 2, look for things that are out of place, or unexpected in a familiar story.  Ask yourself questions, and write them down to share Thursday.  Once through it, go back over it, prayerfully considering what might be God's point for inspiring this story (don't assume), the role of His Spirit in these events, and then what is the central event on which the others turn.  Then, on your third time through, consider the questions below.

• What does Pentecost celebrate (there's a link, but also look in any resources you have as well)?
• What senses (of the 5) are used to describe the Holy Spirit's arrival?
• Look up the word "filled" in Strong's (G4130).  What does it add to the English word, "filled"?
• What connection do you see between verses 4 and 5 if any?  Or is 5 just a transition?
• What does the assembled crowd tell you about the "sensory" details of the event?
• There is one popular area of the Mediterranean Sea missing in this list of peoples.  Which one?
• Two words are used in verse 7 for the "feelings" of the crowd, "amazed" (G1839) and "astonished" (G2296). How are they different, and what do you imagine the crowd doing?
• How did they know they were all Galileans? So what if they are?
• In verse 12 there are two others (or one different), "amazed" (G1839 again) and "perplexed" (G1280). How is this different from "astonished"?
• The term "new wine" is the translation of this word (G1098).  What seems odd about this suggestion?
• Look up Joel 2.  What is this chapter about?  Is that what's happening here?  How is it similar?
• What is the core claim of Peter about Jesus in verses 22-24?
•  Look up Psalm 16:8-11.  How does the meaning of the Psalm change if it's applied to Jesus?  What does that mean for its application in David's day?
• Peter makes a good case for not applying it to David.  How would the people of Israel understood it?
• The people respond with, "What do we do?"  What is Peter's answer?  Is that enough?
• What is church like in verses 42-47?  What's the core quality they have?
• What would it be like for our church to be like this?  What stops us?

That should do for now.  Remember to bring your questions.  Pray for each other this week.  Pray especially for Lyndsay.  She will be really busy preparing for Sunday because it's going to be all music all the time (except for Communion); very tiring, both preparing and performing.

I look forward to seeing you all Thursday!

A Lot of Choice

This is the study page for the Thursday Night Group meeting August 16.  This is for Acts chapter 1.

This chapter is a great introduction into the beginnings of one of the most amazing entities in existence; a group of humans that form the bride of the Master of the universe.  It's pretty bizarre when you think about it.  And this chapter has some of that strangeness in it as well.

As you read the chapter, consider the following few questions.  As always, consider questions of your own. 

• Is this a story or a letter?
• What is different between how this account begins and how the Gospel of Luke ends (see Luke 24:45-53)?
• Who is present in the upper room who wasn't there in the Gospel of Luke (or the other ones either)?
• In the final half of the chapter, what is Peter leading them to do?
• What verses does he use to explain it, and what do you think those passages refer to?
• This occurs before the Holy Spirit comes upon them in power as Jesus mentions.  Why would they do this now rather than wait for that event?
• What is the point or role of this "ministry"?
• Who chose Matthias?

Those should do for now.  We may revisit some of these later in the book.

I look forward to opening up this particular "can" with all of you this Thursday.  I hope you enjoy the blessings of our Master and Savior, Jesus until then.