What Are We To Do With The Unrightous Steward?

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting September 8 to study Luke 16:1-13, the parable of the unrighteous steward.  I doubt this parable is all that familiar since most teaching and preaching avoids it like some disease.  But this parable serves to introduce several sayings, teachings, and discourses of Jesus on wealth.  So, to understand this parable, viewing the chapter as a whole is probably necessary. 

To that end, begin by reading all of Chapter 16.  Note the various things Jesus says about wealth throughout.  These things will need to be used in examining this parable.  Once through the chapter, go back and read the parable again with the issues raised in the rest of the chapter also in view.  Try and distill Jesus' point of the parable down to a single sentence.  Make notes as to why you chose that particular sentence and jot down questions that have occurred to you as you study the parable (we'll get to the rest of the chapter in due time...okay this month, I hope).

After you've done your own study, try looking through any commentary you have available and see how that affects your views.  Revise your sentence if you like, and any questions or notes as well.

After you have gone through the chapter yourself, go back through with the questions below:

• Luke has a "scene switch" as he says Jesus switches to talking to His disciples.  Basically, Jesus narrows His audience.  Why do you think this parable would be for just them?
• The characters of the parable are the master, his steward, accusers, and debtors.  Who do you think they correspond to in the application of the parable in Jesus' day?  Who do you think they correspond to in our day?
• The steward is accused of squandering the goods, he is called on the carpet to give an account, and he doesn't know what to do.  So, do you think that means he was squandering the goods, or what do you think?
• The steward reasons himself into a "solution".  How would you describe his goal with his solution?
• The steward summons each of his master's debtors and reduces their debt on the books he's about to return to his master.  Why do you think this is such a good idea?  Does Jesus think it's a good idea?
• The master firing the steward praises him for reducing the debts of those who owed him money.  Why do you think the master would praise the steward for reducing his assets?  How is that a good thing?
• Jesus' explanation is that the "sons of this age are more shrewd than the sons of light in dealing with their own generation."  What do you think this means?
• So how do you think the steward is a good example?
• Jesus says to makes friends for yourself with unrighteous wealth so that these friends will welcome you into eternal dwellings...so what do you think this means?  It seems to be the point of the parable, so it seems to be important.
• We have the "faithful in little, faithful in much" and it's opposite.  And then a further application of being faithful with what isn't yours and perhaps you will have of your own.  Your own what?  What sort of wealth do you think Jesus has in view here?  Earthly, heavenly, monetary, more people "saved", something entirely different?  Cleaner laundry? (may it never be!)
• We stop at Luke's quote of Jesus about servant serving two masters. Matthew uses nearly the exact same statement of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 6:24).  Look up "mammon" on the Blue Letter Bible (love this site - I keep saying that, don't I?).  What strikes you about the difference between the two conclusions?
• How do you see this truth Jesus about serving two masters as true in your own life?  What have been your two masters?
• Money or wealth seems to be what we spend at least 8 hours a day seeking or trying to obtain.  What do you spend more than 40 hours a week seeking that's not an occupation?
• So, between whatever you used to answer the previous question and a job, how much of your life do you think is available to the Holy Spirit?  How do you think we can make that a trick question?

That should keep us busy for a while.  This is a goofy wonky parable.  It's one of the more difficult to understand, but may not be that difficult to accept once understood (however you understand it).  Be sure to bring your notes and questions, and single-sentence summary to group Thursday!

Finding Party

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study meeting September 1 to study Luke 15 (since we didn't even touch it last week).  This chapter is made up of 3 parables about the rejoicing in heaven over repentant people.  The first two setup the third.

Read through these a few times.  Their familiarity, especially with the third will be the biggest barrier to really understanding them.  I found it very helpful to keep Luke 14:25-35 in view as you read through these parables because together they provide balance to the issue of evangelism, an intrinsic issue in these parables.

If you're only going to read it once, or focus on it once, do it with an unfamiliar translation.  Jot down things you notice, questions that come up, and details you don't remember quite that way before.  After making your own study, go back through with the questions below:

• After Jesus turns to the many crowds following Him and tells them how expensive it is to be a 'disciple', now "all the tax collectors and sinners" are following Him.  Considering the previous passage, how committed do you think these tax collectors and sinners were about following Jesus?
• Both the Pharisees and scribes began to grumble about all the tax collectors and sinners around Jesus and His close association with them.  What does that tell you about these two ends of the spectrum of "righteousness" among those following Jesus?
• Why do you think the Pharisees and scribes always seem to be around Jesus as well?
• Jesus tells the parable of the lost sheep, explaining how the shepherd leaves the 99 in the fields to find the lost one.  And then finding celebrates with his friends and neighbors.  Jesus explains this to illustrate the celebrating in heaven over one repentant person.  So, what do you think is the point to those following Jesus?  Where are they in the parable?
• Jesus then tells the parable of the lost coin where the woman seeks diligently, and then celebrates with her friends and neighbors when she finds it.  Again the rejoicing in heaven is the explanation.  So where are the listeners around Jesus in this parable?
• Then the parable of the lost son.  Now there is a lot more detail.  The lost son repents for one thing (only found in the previous explanations).  The father goes out while the son is still far off, but how diligently is the father seeking the son, as in the previous two parables?
• The lost son is welcomed back and they throw a party.  The elder son is upset (like the Pharisees and scribes).  So, how do you think the father's explanation to his elder son clarifies the response of heaven, and what Jesus expects of the "righteous"?
• Consider again the cost of discipleship from the previous chapter.  How do you see that relating to these parables of rejoicing over finding lost?  How do you see "discipleship" related to elements of the parables or their explanations?

It is likely we won't get through all of chapter 15, but it's possible we will.  The "AHA" of this chapter should be easy since we spent so much time on this parable through that study.  But see what you can do tying the cost of discipleship to the parables, and what you learn from that?

The High Cost of Following

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study meeting August 18 to study Luke 14:25-35.  This passage wraps up the chapter, but it also serves as a transitional narrative between the banquet which begins Chapter 14 and the set of parables about God's perspective of kingdom people living outside the kingdom (all of chapter 15).

This is essentially about the cost of discipleship but with lots of other elements sprinkled throughout.  Read through the passage asking "why" a lot.  This is a familiar passage, but there are some elements that should give us reasons to ask why Jesus said that, and said it that way.  Once through, see what you think about what it means to be a disciple.

After reading through making your own notes and questions, go back through with the questions below:

• Jesus has basically just come away from a meal where He says the people assuming they're in with God won't be.  So now many throngs of people follow Him.  What do you think these crowds are seeking from Jesus?
• Jesus says to "be His disciple" means to hate ones own family and even themselves.  First off, what do you think Jesus means by "disciple"?  Second, how do you understand this familiar but difficult statement?  How do you think this "hate" for ones family and self would look today?
• Jesus speaks to them as if the cost of being one of His "peeps" is very expensive.  So what do you think Jesus thinks the crowd is after Him for?
• Jesus has used the "cross carrying" motif before (Luke 9:23).  But here it's a bit different.  What do you think is the difference in Jesus' point here from before? (be sure to look at the context of both passages)
• In each element (hating family or carrying cross), the result is that if someone does not do it they cannot be a disciple.  Why do you think it's not possible without these two things?
• Jesus gives two examples of how to approach the desire to be His disciple.  Both advise making sure upfront that you have what it takes before venturing to be a disciple.  How do you think this applies to "missionary" or "evangelism" work? (Consider Matthew 28:19-20)
• Considering the use of the term "disciple" by Jesus, what should people think through before deciding to become one?
• Who comes to your mind when you think of a foundation but no complete building, in terms of people following Jesus?
• The king is already on his way and hasn't yet figured out what he's going to do when he meets the other king.  What sort of picture does this paint for you?
• Verse 33 is very much in line with Luke's theme of discipleship.  What does this do for you and the "cost of discipleship"?
• After discussing the cost of discipleship, Jesus then uses this illustration of salt.  In what way do you see tasteless salt relating to the cost of discipleship?
• How is the tasteless salt like either one of the preceding examples of a tower and going to war?
• Look up Matthew 5:13 and Mark 9:50.  How do you think these two other uses of the tasteless salt relate?  Same point or different?

The one having ears to hear, listen!

A Difficult Dinner Guest

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study meeting August 11 to study Luke 14:7-24.  This passage wraps up the banquet narrative begun in verse 1.  In it Jesus essentially makes sure He doesn't miss insulting anyone, host to guests.  Consider this passage as best as you can from the perspective of a First Century Jew.

The passage strings together an address to the guests as they pick places to sit, a criticism of the host, a 'depressurizing' comment of one of the guests, and a final parable denouncing the Jewish inclusion in the 'Kingdom of God'.  Read through these and imagine you are one of those around the edges of the event looking and listening in.  What do you hear?  What do you see?  Imagine the look on everyone's faces, and so on.

Read through the passage in a couple of translations.  I think you'll find they are mostly in agreement except for word choice.  Make some notes and jot down questions.  Think through the scene, starting at verse 1.  As you 'walk through', what do you notice?  After having gone through a few commentaries, go back through with the questions below:

• Luke calls Jesus' comment to the guests as He sees them picking spots a parable.  Do you see any 'story' elements here? What makes Jesus' response to them a parable?
• Jesus says to pick the spot at the bottom of the table, the least honor.  What do you think is risky about following His advice?
• According to Jesus, by picking the chief place you risk humiliation, if someone of greater honor shows up and all the other spots are taken.  What does that sound like to you?  Who's actually invited, and how do you imagine seating is arranged?
• Jesus claims that by taking the lower seat, the guest would be raised up.  What if he isn't?
• Jesus claims that there will be a reversal in verse 11.  So, do you think this is a general rule of life or something about 'end-times' or something about life in church, or what?
• Jesus then begins on the host saying he invited the wrong people.  Why do you think Jesus would start in on the host?  What do you think is the problem with not inviting those close to you to a banquet?
• Jesus recommends inviting those who cannot repay by reciprocating.  How do you think this applies to us today?  How can we follow this advice?  How comfortable are you with it?
• Jesus says the repayment for following His advice comes in the resurrection of the righteous.  Why do you think Jesus put it that way?  What do you think He meant by that?
• Some random guest takes Jesus final comment, and probably tries to relieve the awkwardness of the host and guests by declaring common ground.  Why do you think he would do that?  What do you see as his assumptions?
• Jesus begins another parable, this time of a host inviting guests.  The excuses given are very specific.  What are the odds that those at the table have used them before, and might see this as a very personal example?
• Jesus then says the host, having been rebuffed by the invited guests calls those Jesus has suggested to His host.  What do you think this meant to the guests and host hearing this parable?
• Then, there's still room, and the servant is told to go outside the city to get people.  What do you think this is a reference to?
• Jesus wraps up the parable by stating that none of those invited at first will eat of the banquet.  What do you think that means to the other guests and host?
• What do you see as Jesus' point with this last parable?

Keep in mind that so much of this is applicable today, and none of us would be or should be all that comfortable with the application.  Consider how the spiritual gift of "hospitality" is played out considering this passage.  It's a little or a lot disturbing.  What can we do about that?

Dealing With Pharisees Part I: Testing The Teacher

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting August 4 to study Luke 13:31-14:6.  I believe that I told everyone last Thursday that the "Dinner Party" started in verse 7, but I was wrong.  Chapter 14 verses 1 through 24 are the same "dinner party" in Luke.  So, we'll begin it this week and finish it next.

It will be helpful to read the context of this dinner party.  It forms one event in Luke, but could possibly have been a composite of several dinners with any number of hosts.  Luke has this as one event, which is also a possibility.  Either way, Jesus is not all that comfortable a guest to have in the house of this particular host.  He eventually insults the host and the other guests, thoroughly.

Read through the passage (this part, and the rest through 24 for context) several times.  Try and get a sense of the setting.  Journey, Pharisees coming to Jesus to warn Him about Herod, and then a chief of theirs invites Him to dinner.  How nice.  Everyone seems to be getting along.  Make notes from the perspective of yourself standing among the crowd witnessing this.  Including looking in on the dinner party as they recline with some diseased person standing there with them (how does that look in your mind?).  Make notes on what you see, what you hear, who is doing what, and why.

After you gone through your own observation journey, perhaps read it through in different translations, then maybe read a commentary or two.  See if that helps to define the scene better for you.  Adjust your notes and questions accordingly.

Then go back through with the questions below:

• Luke is clear to point out the immediacy of the next event.  Why do you think Luke would tie the Pharisees warning so closely with the previous statements?
• They warn that Herod wants to kill Jesus.  How likely, based on the crucifixion account later, do you think it is that they are right?
• Jesus responds that He must go to Jerusalem, because no prophet can die outside of the city.  While that's not strictly true, what do you think Jesus is getting at?
• Jesus has to cast out demons and perform cures on His way, but look at the timing.  To what do you think Jesus may be referring in His "third day" reference?
• Jesus then prophesies over Jerusalem in the form of a lament.  How do you feel about Jesus' words?  What emotions do they evoke for you?
• Jesus has wanted to gather the city like chicks under the wings of a mother hen.  As people hear this, what do you think they think about His words?  What do you think this sounds like? See if you can find a reference to this imagery in the Hebrew Scriptures (Hen gathering her chicks).
• What do you think Jesus' last comment refers to, His Triumphal Entry or His eventual appearing later? 
• Jesus then enters the house of one of the leaders of the Pharisees.  How possible do you think it is that the preceding account was some sort of test?  What do you think the connection is?
• The "Guests" are watching Jesus very closely with a diseased person standing there.  He's obviously a plant (a human planted intentionally at the scene, not a shrub).  Jesus has already healed on the Sabbath several times already in Luke, so why would they be watching for what shouldn't really surprise them?  Have they not heard Jesus defend healing on the Sabbath before?  Don't these guys talk to each other?
• The man has a disease referred to in the KJV as "dropsy" and many other translations have picked this term as well.  Other modern versions call it "swelling".  Look up the word here in the Blue Letter Bible site.  What do you think it means, and what problems do you see in figuring that out?
• Jesus asks the guests (lawyers and Pharisees) about the legality before He heals.  Why do you think He would do that?
• They remains silent when asked about the legality.  Considering that Pharisees and lawyers don't always agree on things, why do you think they might have remained silent?
• Jesus heals the man and send him away.  Then starts the discussion.  What does it tell you about Jesus that He heals and sends him away first, then discusses it?
• Jesus then asks, who doesn't pull a son or a cow (really? cow?) out of a well on the Sabbath.  Again no one says a thing.  What is interesting to you about His question?  Consider His previous questions (13:15-16 for example), what is different here?
• They could not give an answer.  The NIV says they had nothing to say, but other translations state they were not able, and the Greek reads that way.  What do you think it means that they could not answer, why not?

That should keep us busy for some time.  Remember to be looking for the AHA moments as you read.  Let this stuff sink into your heart and remember it's for you in your walk with Jesus.  Let His Spirit interpret for you what He wants to reveal about you.  These are growth opportunities, let's grab them!

The Kingdom of God is like and full of...

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study meeting July 21 to study Luke 13:18-35.  This passage has two very peculiar similes of the Kingdom of God, a parable about who will be there, and a prophecy over Jerusalem.  It's possible to see these three things related beyond simply all being about the Kingdom of God, but it's not necessary.

Read through the passage a few times, reading what came before and what comes after to get a sense of the literary context.  Luke has put these things together, and part of what we'll be doing is trying to figure out why. Make notes and jot down questions.  After that consult other resources and perspectives.  Revise your notes and questions accordingly.  After that, go back through with the questions below:

• Verse 18 begins with "Therefore", tying it to the previous passage (v.10-17).  What do you think these two "similes" (using "like" or "as" for comparison) have to do with the healing on the Sabbath?
• Jesus asks what he should compare the Kingdom to as a rhetorical device, it draws the attention of the listeners.  But He then answers with these two baffling comparisons.  What do you think His listeners thought of His comparisons?
• First the Kingdom is like a mustard seed.  In His description it is planted by a person and it then grows into a large tree used by birds for nesting.  How do these things, the mustard seed (Kingdom), man (God?), large tree, and nesting birds all have to do with the Kingdom of God?
• Again He asks the rhetorical question about to what to compare the Kingdom.  Why do you think He would ask the question again?
• This time, the Kingdom is like "bread starter" or a heavily leavened lump.  Now a woman conceals the lump in flour and the whole rose.  How do these things, the leavened lump (Kingdom), the woman (God?), and three measures of flour all relate to the Kingdom of God?
• Next, in verse 22, He's traveling toward Jerusalem again, and someone asks about getting to the Kingdom of God.  Try to look at this question from the perspective of a First Century Jew.  What do you think the man means by "few"?  (few Jews, few people-groups, few Gentiles, few porcupines, what?)
• Jesus responds with a "narrow gate" answer, but it's not like Matthew's quote in Matthew 7:13-14.  In Matthew there are two paths, one narrow, one wide.  Why do you think Luke's would have only one narrow door?
• Luke goes on to describe the door as to a household and many being shut out.  Now the description takes on a different tone, like that of Matthew 7:21-23.  In Matthew, the shut-outs prophesied and cast out demons.  In Luke the people ate and drank and heard Him in their streets.  What do you think Luke is getting at that makes his so different than Matthew's?
• What do you think of the "familiarity" of the people shut out in Luke's account?
• Jesus finally calls the shut-outs "evil-doers", but at first, and then again, He says, "I do not know where you are from".  What do you think this repeated phrase means?  Why wouldn't God know where these people were from?
• In the place the shut-outs go, they can see Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob eating with people from all over (east, west, north, and south).  It sounds like this ability to see but not join in is what makes their place full of gnashing teeth and weeping.  Why do you think God would punish people in such a way?
• What do you think Jesus' description of the punishment sounded like to His Jewish listeners?
• Jesus then wraps up with a statement that the last will be first and the first who will be last.  What do you think He means here?
• Luke is clear to point out the immediacy of the next event.  Why do you think Luke would tie the Pharisees warning so closely with the previous statements?
• They warn that Herod wants to kill Jesus.  How likely, based on the crucifixion account later, do you think it is that they are right?
• Jesus responds that He must go to Jerusalem, because no prophet can die outside of the city.  While that's not strictly true, what do you think Jesus is getting at?
• Jesus has to cast out demons and perform cures on His way, but look at the timing.  To what do you think Jesus may be referring in His "third day" reference?
• Jesus then prophesies over Jerusalem in the form of a lament.  How do you feel about Jesus' words?  What emotions do they evoke for you?
• Jesus has wanted to gather the city like chicks under the wings of a mother hen.  As people hear this, what do you think they think about His words?  What do you think this sounds like? See if you can find a reference to this imagery in the Hebrew Scriptures (Hen gathering her chicks).
• What do you think Jesus' last comment refers to, His Triumphal Entry or His eventual appearing later?

That should keep us busy for a while.  Remember to use the AHA structure to examine personal application.

Seeing Things God's Way

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting July 7 to study Luke 13:1-17.  This begins the thirteenth chapter finally.  We'll be looking at a teaching, a parable, and a healing.  Some commentaries think they're separate (at least the healing from the parable/teaching), but I think there's a common connection.

Read through the passage in a few different translations, jot down notes and questions, and then check out some commentaries.  Revise your notes and questions if necessary, and then go through the questions below:

• Current events were circulated by word-of-mouth in that day, so the report in verse 1 isn't unusual or surprising in a sense.  It's even expected since everyone knew Jesus was from Galilee and would think He'd want to know.  So why do you think He responds so negatively?
• Jesus hears their report and begins challenging a belief that "things happen in proportion to the degree of sin of the people who suffer in it".  Jesus instead puts everyone in the same "sin-bucket".  Why do you think people would believe that sin drives the degree of suffering?
• Jesus says, "repent or perish", this sounds pretty strong and in the context, people actually died.  So, what do you think Jesus meant by this warning?
• What do you think it means to "repent"?
• In the context of the report, Jesus simply tells people to repent, but doesn't explicitly tell them from what (except the belief that suffering is directly related to the degree of sinfulness in a persons' life).  What do you think Jesus had in mind for them to repent from and to?
• The parable of the fig tree happens in a vineyard.  In their day this wasn't that unusual, and vineyards often are imagery for Israel, so what do you think the fig tree represented in parable?
• Who is the vineyard owner?  Who is the vinedresser/vineyard keeper/gardener/vineyard worker?
• If the tree has one more year, what do you think this means for the "fig tree"?
• So, if the problem the fig tree has is producing figs, what do you think this means for those needing to repent?  What do you think they need to do to survive after the year?
• If (and I believe it does) the parable related to the need for repentance, then what do you infer from it about repentance?  What do you think it teaches about what repentance means?  What do you learn about repentance for your own life?
• Immediately it's the Sabbath, and Jesus is teaching in the synagogue.  What do you think it means that Jesus is allowed or asked to teach in a synagogue?  Why do you think He would be allowed to do that when His popularity with the religious leaders is on the decline?
• Jesus sees a woman who is bent over and it is from spiritual oppression.  He heals her, but not with the wording associated with casting out demons.  So, what do you think was going on with the woman?
• Jesus calls her over to Him (up front), declares her healed, and then touches her.  Why do you think He healed her this way?
• The synagogue leader cites the law about abstaining from your occupation on the Sabbath.  What do you infer about what he believes about Jesus' occupation?  What do you think is Jesus' occupation?
• The synagogue leader doesn't address Jesus, he addresses the crowd.  Who do you think he had a problem with?
• Jesus wastes no time in calling out the legal problem.  Do you think the leaders would have considered animals more important than this woman?  So why would such exceptions be made for animals but not for people?  What sort of "healing" was going on besides Jesus that they would have prohibited its exercise on the Sabbath?
• Jesus points out the problem of priority in the oral tradition or explanation of the law.  What do you think God intends for the Sabbath?  What is it supposed to be about?
• His "opponents" were humiliated.  What does that tell you about those in attendance?
• Why do you think the crowd would be so favorable when the leaders were humiliated?  Why wouldn't that bother the crowd?

That should keep us busy.  Remember to apply the "Awakening", "Honesty", and "Action" process to find the application the Holy Spirit has for you in this passage.  What would repentance look like for you?