Worship Problems, From Head Gear to Meal Ettiquette

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Group meeting September 4 to study 1 Corinthians 11.  This is a somewhat weird chapter, at least it begins weird.  The first verse actually goes with chapter 10, the first issue is very confusing after 2,000 years of cultural change, and the second issue seems to refer to a practice of the Lord's Supper we no longer use, and no one seems to remember.

So, part of our problems will be how to apply these peculiarities to our life today.  If it's so difficult to see what Paul's talking about then, it will be extremely hard to come up with what we need to carry forward 2,000 years to our church life today.  I'm confident we'll find something, but it will be very interesting to discover what.

Read through the chapter in as many translations as you have.  I know this takes time, but there isn't a better practice that will bring linguistic issues to the forefront.  Even as I translate, I still have about 6 versions right there to look at while I'm doing it; it helps to spot inconsistencies or consistencies in translation.  Differences are good places to ask questions or make some further investigation, like with a Strong's.

After reading through several times, jotting down notes and questions, read through again with the questions below:

• Do you think Paul is being 'truthful' in verse 2?  Do they really 'remember him'?  Do they really hold firmly to traditions?  Has he given any examples of that either in previous chapters or in this one?
• Do you think there is a 'progression' in verse 3?  Does it go 'Christ, man, woman'? What about God?
• The word 'head' is used twice in verse 4, do you think Paul is referring to the man's literal head both times?  Why or why not? (you may need to think about this verse in light of verse 3 to answer)
• Not only is 'head' used twice in verse 5, but clearly a literal head is in view because of 'shaved', and 'shorn' in verse 6.  But do you think her literal head is 'disgraced'?  Why or why not? (again, consider verse 3 and then verse 7)
• Read Genesis 1:27.  What do you think of Paul's allusion to this verse in verse 7?  Do you think his argument makes sense as he applies Gen 1:27 to this issue of head-coverings?
• Verses 8 and 9 originate out of the Genesis 2 creation story (Gen 2:20-24).  What do you think of Paul's use of those verses here?
• From verses 7 through 9, Paul clearly refers to the creation account in Genesis.  Why do you think he would go there for this issue?
• You really need to look at verse 10 in at least a King James or New King James translation.  Then look at a New International or New American Standard version.  If you have it, look at the whole passage in the New Revised Standard.  All these translations work over verse 10 differently.  Note especially the 'italics' where a word is added that does not appear in the Greek text.  Read the verse through without the italicized words.  What do you think might be an alternative meaning after reading it that way?
• Do you think verses 11 and 12 soften Paul's stance on women in church, or do they simply reveal his true belief which lies behind what he writes here?  Why do you think any such distinction is important, both to us and to the church in Corinth?
• In verses 13 through 15, does Paul truly support his view of head covering with his point about hair?  Have you ever seen a picture of Jesus with short hair?  Any of the apostles?  Ever?  What do you think he's referring to here? 
• Since Roman customs seemed to include men with what we would consider 'short hair', it might be easy to say this is local for Corinth, a Roman colony.  But do you think we can really do that considering verse 16?
• Switching gears, he says, 'But in giving this instruction, I do not praise you...'  What instruction, the one he concluded, or the one coming up?  And if the one concluded, why would he start it with a statement that seems to imply he does praise them?  If the one coming up, then what do you make of the 'praise' in verse 2?
• Read 1 Corinthians 1:10 and 11.  Why do you think Paul would put 'in part' about his belief of 'divisions' when he's already covered some of them?  What might that mean for this particular issue?
• After criticizing their 'divisions' at the beginning of the letter, he now claims they are necessary?  What do you think he means by that?
• In their practice of the Lord's Supper, Paul says it has stopped being the Lord's Supper.  Why do you think that would be the case?
• Paul describes what they are doing in verses 21 and 22.  How would you describe what they are doing?  For instance, where do you think this happens?  Try, as best as you can, to remove your own 21st Century practice out of the mix, and imagine what is happening.
• Paul repeats for them what he had delivered to them when he was there.  Where does he say he got it?  What do you think he means by 'I received from the Lord...' since he wasn't a disciple of Jesus?
• Paul uses a word 'remembrance' in his quotes of Jesus in verses 24 and 25. Look it up here.  What do you think could be another or even better English word choice?
• What do you think about Paul's point of the Lord's Supper in verse 26?  Is that what it's all about to you?
• What is Paul's claim that to eat the Lord's Supper in an 'unworthy manner' is guilty of the body and blood of the Lord tied back to?  Why does that make you guilty of the body and blood of the Lord?
• Look up the word, 'examine' here.  What other English words would work well here?
• What do you think you should be looking for in this examination?
• What are the consequences for not examining yourself as you take the Lord's Supper?
• Considering the consequences, what do you make of verse 32?  Do you think Paul is saying it's for our own good when we die because we take the Lord's Supper unworthily?
• Paul applies this to the specific practice in Corinth in verses 33 and 34.  How do you think we should apply it in our worship?

That should keep us plenty busy Thursday.  I hope you can make good use of the extra day to study.  This is a perplexing chapter, so let's puzzle over it together!

Life Lessons from Israel and Communion

This is the study page for the Thursday Night Bible Study Group meeting August 28 to study 1 Corinthians 10.  This chapter possibly wraps up the topic of 'eating food sacrificed to idols'.  It has lots of interesting pieces to it including an assessment/application of Israel's history to current church life.  It contains several familiar verses, but I'll bet this is the first time most of us have really dug through the context of them.

Read through the chapter several times, jotting down observations and questions.  Look through several translations, and note areas of disagreement.  Also, bring different translations to the group - like the different one we had last week.  That helps us all get different perspectives. 

After reading through and making your own notes/questions, read through again using the questions below:

• Paul points out the 'unity' of experience of the people of Israel in the desert (vs. 1-4), but notes that God was not pleased with them.  What counter-argument do you think he is trying to undermine with that statement (it's all one sentence in Greek)?  What do you think the believers in Corinth were saying that needed this to correct?
• Paul begins to site their faults as 'examples'.  Keeping in mind the passages so far in this letter, why do you think Paul chose these items as examples?
• Which of those that Paul chose do you think still apply to church today?
• Paul thinks he lives at the end of the age (v. 11).  In what ways might he have been right?
• After the illustrations from Israel's history, then he puts in the verse about temptation (v. 13), but not before his challenge to those who think they stand.  Why do you think he's 'building' his argument right here this way?  What do you think he's arguing against in the church in Corinth?
• We have been told that we are to flee immorality as a sin, but here we are told to also feel idolatry.  Why do you think we hear so much about the one, but not the other in our churches today?
• Paul now applies these things to the Lord's Supper.  This is why we call it "Communion", we all partake together from the same thing.  Paul acknowledges that this unifies the church, but what do you think he sees as the 'additional lesson' they should have taken from it?
• In verse 22, what lesson from Israel do you think Paul might be referring back to?
• What do you think Paul means in verse 23?  Are all things truly 'permissible' or 'lawful'?
• Now Paul lays down some specific direction.  Who do you think this direction is for? Who do you think this direction is supposed to affect?  Why do you think Paul may have switched his 'victim' here at the end?  Or do you think he did?
• How do you think all this changes or modifies your understanding of verse 31?  Or has it?
• What are some ways we can apply the ending principle of verses 32-33 in our lives/church?

That should keep us busy for at least an hour.  Remember to bring your own notes to share.  

Free To Be Free, But Disciplined

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Study Group meeting August 21 to study 1 Corinthians 9.  This chapter seems to be an opportunity for Paul to vent; like he's tired of people taking advantage of him.  Or perhaps you might see him attempting to reassert some credibility among churches.  But I think, when you look closer, those things have little to do with this chapter.

Read through this chapter several times, use as many translations as you have handy.  Look for places where translations seem to disagree.  Those are good places to check the footnotes to see why.  Make notes, jot down questions, and highlight stuff where the Spirit seems to be highlighting stuff for you.  Then, step back from the chapter, and read it aloud straight through.  If you don't see a unifying theme different from the elements, then try it again, only include the last verse from 8.  If that doesn't work, read 8, 9, and 10 together.

After you've read through, made notes, asked questions, read through again using the questions below:

• There is some debate about what 'Apostle' means in the New Testament, and who is referred to when the term is used.  What do you think Paul means by the term in verse 1 and 2, and what do you think his criteria is for using the term on himself?
• This chapter takes on a defensive tone because of verse 3.  Why do you think he's defending himself, and against whom do you think he's defending himself?
• Corinth was visited in the second missionary journey, without Barnabas.  So why do you think Paul brings him up and not Timothy and Silas?
• Do you think Paul is complaining in verses 4 through 14?  He pulls from culture, Scripture, common religious practice, and then his own rights.  Why do you think he's working so hard at supporting his stance here?
• In verse 15, Paul's argument takes a dramatic turn.  In a sense, he up-ends the whole thing on the reader/listener, and then shoves it down around their ears.  What do you think he's up to by doing that?
• When Paul says he'd rather die than to receive 'wages' for preaching, do you think he's being a 'drama king' or do you think something else is driving him?  If you think it's something else, what do you think that might be?
• In verses 16 through 18, Paul drives home his point of view, within his ministry, but how do you think he intends the believers in Corinth to apply it?
• In verse 19, Paul makes a statement, then supports it in verses 20 through 22.  Again though, how do you think he intends the believers in Corinth to apply this?  How do you think a 'craftsman' or 'laborer' or 'slave' can 'become all things to all men to win some'?
• In Corinth, they had the Isthmian Games, second only to the Olympics in the Mediterranean.  So, the people are very well acquainted with Paul's imagery in verses 24 through 27.  But what do you think Paul refers to as the 'crown', and what does it seem to require to get it?  What do you see possibly wrong with this view, or how do you think it can be distorted?

That should keep us busy for the evening.  I look forward to seeing you Thursday.

Choosing Your 'Restaraunt' Carefully

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Group meeting August 14 to study 1 Corinthians 8.  This is a short chapter, but the discussion could carry us for an hour.  This begins what is possibly the second longest discussion within 1 Corinthians.  I think the discussion on spiritual gifting is longer, but this one easily rivals that one.

The discussion on food sacrificed to idols is very culturally contextualized.  Applying what Paul teaches here is truly more about the principles he uses rather than the practice.  But there are ample places to apply the principles.  As you study this chapter, see what contemporary cultural practice you can come up with that will form a decent parallel to the application of these principles.  It may not be easy, and we will all need to make some concessions as to points of similarity and difference.  I'm not convinced there is a modern practice that will fit as nicely into this discussion as sacrificial food did then.  But there may be.  See what you can find.

Read through this very short chapter a few times.  In this chapter, since it's so short, you may more easily see the argument structure Paul uses to start.  As you read through, look for argument structures, but also different words in different translations, changes in sentence structure, and anything you find surprising or noteworthy.  After going through a few times, read back through with these questions:

• Why do you think Paul makes reference to 'knowledge' right at the beginning?
• How do you think it's possible that if you think you know, you're actually stupid?
• Why do you think being known by God is a 'counter point' to knowing something?
• What do you think Paul meant by 'many gods and many lords'?
• Look at verse 6 in several translations, as many as you can find.  Do any of them structure it as a 'poem'?  What do you think that might mean if it was a poem?
• In verse 7 Paul gets at other side of the problem with food sacrificed to idols.  Essentially, this 'knowledge' that there is only One God isn't 'universal' within the church.  What possible modern situation can you think of that parallels this problem?
• Paul concedes that eating does not commend or convict us before God.  Considering Paul's Jewish roots, what do changes in thinking you think Paul had to make to come to that conclusion? 
• In verse 9, Paul lays out the principle he uses to begin this argument.  What can you think of today where we can apply this principle?
• In verse 10, the effect is that one without the underlying knowledge eats (and sins in his mind/heart).  Why do you think the solution is not 'education'?  Why do you think abstinence is the only option Paul will recommend?
• For the one without knowledge to eat means that he is 'ruined', the brother for whom Christ died.  So what is it that constitutes sin, the action or the heart and belief?  Do you think that's always true?
• To cause another to 'stumble' in their walk with Jesus is to sin against Jesus.  Do you think this is also about the heart and belief as opposed to action?
• Do you think Paul is advocating a 'vegan' lifestyle?

That should help us have plenty to discuss.  On into this discussion in the following chapters, you may want to revisit some of your conclusions here; on the other hand, you may not.  This part of the argument isn't the conclusion, it's the opening, first point of his argument.  It only gets more fun from here.

End-Times Marriage...Or Not

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Study Group meeting August 7 to study 1 Corinthians 7.  There's a ton in this chapter, so we'll get to what we can.  The immanent return of Jesus seems to form the overall background of all that Paul recommends and commands in this chapter.  So this will bring up some interesting questions, I hope.

Read through the chapter several times, in as many translations as you can find.  Look for strange wording or where different versions have truly worded it very differently.  In such places pay careful attention to footnotes.  Jot down observations and questions that come to your mind as you read.  Be sure to bring these to the group.

After reading through several times with your own observations and questions, read through again with those below:

• What sort of 'religious' problems do you think Paul might be using in his reference to 'touch'?  Look at Exodus 19:12,13; Leviticus 11:8, 12:4; Deuteronomy 14:8 for help here.  Can you think of others?
• Why do you think Paul balances references to men and women so evenly here?  What do you think that says about the status of women in their congregation? (consider again, 1 Co 1:11)
• Verse 1 and verse 6 seem to 'bracket' this first section.  So Paul gives this command, but doesn't seem happy about it.  What do you think is Paul's overall view of marriage?
• Paul reveals something of his own 'condition' in verse 7, but points out it has to do with 'gifting'.  On the other hand, he doesn't refer to 'gifting' in verse 9.  Why do you think that is?
• In verse 10, Paul shifts from his own views to those of Jesus.  Where is he now getting these instructions?
• In almost every translation it seems what the wife might do in verse 10 is referred to differently than what the husband does in verse 11.  Why do you think Paul switches terms here?  He's still balanced, but perhaps this gives more detail to the circumstances of women?  (look forward to verse 13)
• Why do you think Paul would speak of reconciliation of the wife, but not the husband?  Which is more restrictive here?
• In verse 12, we have a switch away from commands from Jesus and toward Paul's directives.  Why do you think he would switch up here, and how does that help you gain insight to how we can use Scripture?
• Verse 14 is interesting because it is not really clear how this is true and what it means for the unbelieving spouse and children.  References in Ezra 9:2 and Malachi 2:15 are not especially helpful here since they address a different problem.
• In verse 15 do you think Paul is describing 'divorce' and then those rules apply or simply separation? What then happens to the believing spouse?
• Do you think Paul is switching topics entirely in verse 16 or do you see it somehow related to the previous discussion on marriage and divorce?
• In verse 19, Paul says circumcision is nothing, but yet says keeping the commands of God.  Isn't circumcision a command of God?
• Paul has a special section just for circumcision and slavery.  Why do you think these would be two important issues within the church?
• Paul repeats, 'remain in the condition in which you were called.'  Why do you think this might need repeating in this congregation?
• In verse 25, the same grammatical structure used in verse 1, signalling a change in topic is used.  What do you think that means for my question about verse 16?
• In verses 25 through 28, what is Paul's assumption that forms his opinion here?  How do you think this influences his other references previously in this chapter?
• In verses 29 through 31, how would this look for us?  Do you think this still applies today? If so, how?  What do you think it would look like?
• Paul says his motivation is 'unrestricted devotion to God' (verse 35), what is his view of those who marry?  Do you think this is still true today?
• These references to 'virgin' may actually have to do with giving a daughter in marriage.  What do you think it would mean in that culture to not give the daughter in marriage? (we'd all be guessing here)
• Verses 39 and 40 refer to widows.  Here again Paul thinks 'single is better'.  Why do you think he would 'support' his view by claiming that he too has the Spirit of God?

That should do for now.  We may be able to wade through all this in an hour or so.  But we may not either.  We'll take it as we go.

Of Torts and Tarts

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Group meeting July 31 to study 1 Corinthians 6.  This chapter continues, in a sense, the discussion from chapter 5.  While there a specific sin was being addressed, the concept of judging sin within the church also forms the challenge to judge between disputes as well.  There are some challenging elements to this chapter, but the language is fairly straight forward.  It really means what it says, and there isn't a lot of deviation between translations.

Read through the chapter several times, noting thematic elements, transitions, questions, and observations you make along the way.  Paul has some peculiar perspectives, and he commands some peculiar things of the church.  Reviewing chapter 5 and looking ahead at chapter 7 may be helpful in understanding this chapter.

After reading through and making notes, read through again with the questions below:

• The sort of legal process described in verse 1 was one that Moses handled in the desert (Exodus18:13-27).  In other places in Scripture these were handled were in the city gates.  Why do you think Paul wants to keep them in the church?
• Paul uses some interesting reasoning to support his command to keep civil cases in the church.  In verse two he says 'saints will judge the world.' Where do you think he comes up with this?
• Paul then says believers will judge angels in verse 3.  Why do you think he is so adamant about bringing these sorts of legal things in the church?
• Does verse 4 sound to you like the church in Corinth already has 'judges' but these people aren't using them?  If so, why do you think they wouldn't be using such a thing?
• By bringing these civil matters into the public courts, Paul says they should be ashamed.  Why do you think that would be a source of shame?  Why should they instead simply suffer the supposed wrong?
• In verse 8 Paul may supply the reason he thinks they take these issues into the civil courts.  What do you think he means by this charge?
• How do you think we could do something like this in our church?  Maybe some sort of program like the NADR program might work?  Why do you think this might be a good idea?  Why might it not work in our society?
• In verse 9 Paul lists some types of people who will not inherit the Kingdom of God.  Do you think some of the Corinthians still practiced such things?  Do you think we have some who do in our church?
• What do you think is Paul's point in verse 11?  How does this contrast answer what he sees as the foundational problem in verses 1 through 10?
• Do you think Paul completely switches topic in verse 12?
• If all things are 'lawful' how do the 'judges' referred to above 'judge'?  What do you think he means here?
• How do you think is Jesus 'for your body' in verse 13?  In what way is this true?
• Paul also supports his point by pointing to our eventual resurrection.  Why do you think this supports his command to avoid sexual sins?
• In verse 15, what are 'members'?  What is another word for this?  If you use another word for this, how does it changes the meaning for you?
• In verse 16, Paul uses a reference we normally use for marriage.  They did too.  What does that mean to you that he would use it here? 
• Consider verse 17.  Think about that a bit.  What does this statement mean to you?  What other areas in your life does this affect, and how?
• In verse 19, Paul says that their individual bodies are 'temples of the Holy Spirit'.  Refer back to 1 Corinthians 3:16 where it was the 'church'.  How can they both be true?
• What do you think could possibly be the connection between the first 11 verses and 12-20? 

That should keep us busy for at least an hour.  We may not finish, but it may be quick; I never can tell.  Remember to bring your questions and observations to the group.

Judgement Inside Not Outside

This is the Bible study page for the Thursday Night Study Group meeting July 17 to study 1 Corinthians 5.  This is a very interesting chapter.  Along with the following one (they are somewhat related) Paul's call to not judge seems to reverse itself.  The specific instance is also interesting; not so much the sin as the response of the church.

Read through the chapter several times (it's really short).  Look for peculiar statements, questions, and perspectives.  Ask questions of the text like why, what did that really mean, and what did the people of Corinth think that meant?  Things like that will get you thinking about the text.  You/we may not find answers to those questions, but they get us more engaged with what our Master has inspired.  Jot down your questions and observations and bring them to the meeting.

After compiling your own set of questions and observations, go back through the chapter again with the questions below:

• Look up the word used in verse 1 for the sin committed here.  Listen to the pronunciation.  What English word does this Greek word sound like?  Look up the word, 'pornography' (there isn't any on this site).  What is the origin of this English word?  So what does this 'sin' include?  What sort of sexual behavior would it not include?
• Why do you think this particular sin (in this case in Corinth) is considered bad, even among Gentiles?
•  Read Leviticus 18.  This is a long list, but consider that even relations between parents remarried are included.  Also consider the reason given for such a list.  Why do you think God was both thorough and repeatedly supporting His reason citing the people of both Egypt and Canaan?
• Why do you think the church should have mourned over this sin rather than been proud? 
• Paul has already judged this man as spiritually part of the assembly in Corinth.  Why can he do this when he doesn't even 'judge' himself (see 4:3)?  Why leave judgement for the coming of Jesus in chapter 4, but exercise it here in chapter 5? (read ahead to chapter 6 for even more questions)
• Look at 1 Timothy 1:21-20.  What do you think Paul means there and here when he says 'deliver such a one over to Satan'?  How do you think that happens?
• What do you think it means 'destruction of his flesh so that his spirit may be saved'? (good place to use a 'study Bible' or commentary)
• According to verses 6 through 8, what is the effect of this sin on the church in Corinth?  I think it's clear from this passage the church celebrates the Passover.  What do you think is the significance here to Paul's reference to Jesus as our Passover having been sacrificed?  What do you think that means to them?
• The word, 'associate with' or 'company with' is made up of three words, 'together', 'again', and 'mix', in that order (see the 'Root Word' in the entry).  It's not an uncommon Greek word, but it's not used much in Scripture (3 times, twice in this chapter).  What sort of image does this bring to your mind?
• Why do you think Paul would not prohibit the people from associating with immoral people in the world?  Why be so harsh with the same people in the church?  How do you think church today approaches this problem?
• Look at the list of sins in verses 10 and 11.  Did you notice the list for those in the church is longer?  How do you see all these sins listed?  Do you see them as the same, requiring the same response?
• Consider verse 12 along with 4:5.  Paul clearly has two different things in mind here since he assumes they judge those within the church.  What do you think is the difference?
• If those outside the church are judged by God, do you think this relates to Paul's statements about judging in chapter 4?
• Paul quotes a phrase used in Deuteronomy over and over, almost thematically.  Look at Deuteronomy 13:5, 17:7,12, 21:21, and 22:21.  In each instance in Deuteronomy, how is the evil removed?  Considering verse 5, how closely do you think these concepts are related? 

I know this chapter is only 13 verses, but I think we have plenty of topic to discuss with it.  If these questions bring up more for you, then be sure to bring those to share as well.